Ortlieb Gear-Pack

By: Ortlieb
Front facing view of the Ortlieb Gear-Pack

Buy Now

Size Details
Capacity 32.0L
Capacity per Weight 26.7L
Weight 1.2kg 2.6lbs High
Capacity per KgLbs 26.7 12.3 Low
Dimensions 64.0x29.0x18.0cm 26.0x12.0x8.0in
Cubic Space 33408.000cmΒ³ 2496.000inΒ³
Capacity Diff 1L Low
Airline Compatibility

✈️ 30% (59/199)

This bag can be used as a carry on in 30% of airlines.

Link to Manufacturer

πŸ‘ Reasons to Buy

  • Fully waterproof that would protect your things from heavy downpours. Not to mention that is also durable at the same time.
  • Has multiple attachment points for your outdoor gears and other bag accessories.
  • The whole harness system is detachable making it compact and dangle-free for storage. The harness system is also adjustable to provide better fit to the user's body.
  • Available in 25L or 40L.

πŸ€” Things to Consider

  • Features minimal organization.
  • Has no external pockets or a water bottle compartment.

πŸ”Ž Reviews

ORTLIEB Gear Pack 32L
www.basecampgear.co.uk

"One of the most customisable packs out there, the Ortlieb Gear Pack has daisy chains everywhere that let you move about the features of the pack to exactly where you want them. The hip belt, shoulder straps, handles, back panel and accessories are all removable so you can use this pack however you want, even as a large drybag."


Features

Storage
Compression N
Expanded Capacity None
Opening Rolltop
Passport N
Passthrough N
Carry
Backpack R
Hip Belt R
Sternum Strap S
Inside
Laptop 0
Main Compartments 1
Organizer N
Outside
Hard Shell False
Rain-fly N
Water Bottle Holder 0
Water Resistant Y
Material:
PD620, PS620C

Compatible Airlines

Adria Airways, Aerolineas Argentinas, Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela, Air Berlin (Closed), Air Europa, Air Koryo, Air Mauritius, Air New Zealand, Air Tahiti Nui, Air Transat, Aircalin, Alitalia, All Nipon Airways, ANA, Asiana Airlines, Avianca , Azerbaijan Airlines, Azul Airlines, Azul Linhas, Bahamasair, Belavia, Bulgaria Air, Cambodia Angkor Air, Cape Air, Caribbean Airlines, China Southern, Conviasa, Croatia Air, Cubana de Aviacion, Hainan Airlines, Iran Air, Iran Aseman Air, Korean Air, Mango, Nordwind Airlines, Pakistan International, Pegasus Airlines, Philippine Airlines, Qantas Airways, Royal Air Morocco, Royal Jordanian, SAS Scandinavian, Saudi Arabian Airlines, Sichuan Airlines, SilkAir, Silver Airways, Singapore Airlines, SpiceJet, SriLankan Airlines, TAAG Angola, TAM Airlines, TAP Air Portugal, Turkmenistan Airlines, Ural Airlines, uTair Airlines, Uzbekistan Air, Vietnam Airlines, Virgin America, Vivaaerobus

Similar Backpacks

Travel backpacks with similar features and similar capacity.

Front facing view of the Ortlieb Messenger Bag
39.0L

2.9lbs
✈️ 63%
20.0x16.0x6.0in

90% Matching Features
7.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Exped Black Ice 30
30.0L

0.261lbs
✈️ 91%
22.4x10.6x8.7in

86% Matching Features
2.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Exped Serac 35
35.0L

1.8lbs
✈️ 30%
25.0x12.0x10.0in

86% Matching Features
3.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Exped Cloudburst 25
25.0L

0.575lbs
✈️ 98%
20.9x11.0x7.9in

86% Matching Features
7.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Ortlieb Velocity
23.0L

1.9lbs
✈️ 82%
20.0x12.0x7.0in

86% Matching Features
9.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Exped Torrent 30
30.0L

2.5lbs
✈️ 77%
22.0x11.0x8.0in

81% Matching Features
2.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Exped Whiteout 30
30.0L

1.5lbs
✈️ 30%
23.0x11.0x9.0in

81% Matching Features
2.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Exped Core 35
35.0L

0.303lbs
✈️ 89%
24.4x11.8x8.7in

81% Matching Features
3.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Ortlieb Packman Pro2
25.0L

2.2lbs
✈️ 99%
18.5x11.0x5.9in

81% Matching Features
7.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Exped Typhoon 25
25.0L

1.0lbs
✈️ 81%
20.0x12.0x8.0in

81% Matching Features
7.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison