Atom Pack "The Mo"

By: Atom Packs
Front facing view of the Atom Pack "The Mo"
Size Details
Capacity 40.0L
Capacity per Weight 0L
Weight 0.0kg 0.0lbs Low
Capacity per KgLbs 0 0 Low
Dimensions 91.0x84.0x74.0cm 36.0x34.0x30.0in
Cubic Space 565656.000cmΒ³ 36720.000inΒ³
Capacity Diff 525L High
Airline Compatibility

✈️ 18% (35/199)

This bag can be used as a carry on in 18% of airlines.

Link to Manufacturer

πŸ‘ Reasons to Buy

  • Has lots of lash points that would really accommodate your hiking needs.
  • The hip straps are secured and comfortable to use.
  • There is an option to customized the bag according to your needs on its website.
  • Extremely lightweight considering its size and capacity.

πŸ€” Things to Consider

  • The rolltop opening isn't fast to use.
  • Isn't fully waterproof.
  • Issues with the ventilation in the back when the bag is in use.

πŸ”Ž Reviews

Atom Packs The Mo 50L Pack Review
thetrek.co

"The Atom Packs The Mo has been a game-changer for me. It is both the comfiest and the lightest pack I’ve ever used on an overnight backpacking trip. I’ve enjoyed ultralight packs for smaller trips in the past, but I never thought I’d use one for a thru as I’ve never been keen to sacrifice comfort. The Mo proves that with a well-thought-through design, padding where it really matters, and efficient weight distribution, there is no reason ultralight can’t be ultra-comfy. The pack is an all-rounder. I’d recommend it to first-timers and seasoned hikers, over-packers, and ultra-lighters."


Features

Storage
Compression S
Expanded Capacity None
Opening Rolltop
Passport N
Passthrough N
Carry
Backpack S
Hip Belt R
Sternum Strap R
Inside
Laptop 0
Main Compartments 1
Organizer N
Outside
Hard Shell False
Rain-fly N
Water Bottle Holder 2
Water Resistant Y
Material:
VX21 X-Pac fabric

Compatible Airlines

Adria Airways, Aeropostal Alas de Venezuela, Air Berlin (Closed), Air Europa, Air Koryo, Air New Zealand, Air Tahiti Nui, Air Transat, Aircalin, Alitalia, Azul Airlines, Azul Linhas, Cape Air, Caribbean Airlines, China Southern, Croatia Air, Cubana de Aviacion, Hainan Airlines, Korean Air, Pegasus Airlines, Philippine Airlines, Royal Air Morocco, Saudi Arabian Airlines, Sichuan Airlines, SilkAir, Silver Airways, Singapore Airlines, SpiceJet, TAAG Angola, TAM Airlines, Turkmenistan Airlines, Ural Airlines, uTair Airlines, Virgin America, Vivaaerobus

Similar Backpacks

Travel backpacks with similar features and similar capacity.

Front facing view of the Exped Impulse 30
30.0L

0.0lbs
✈️ 63%
22.0x12.0x9.0in

86% Matching Features
10.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Atom Packs "Atom+"
50.0L

0.0lbs
✈️ 100%
0.0x0.0x0.0in

86% Matching Features
10.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Fjallraven High Coast Rolltop 26
26.0L

1.0lbs
✈️ 82%
19.0x11.0x8.0in

86% Matching Features
14.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the ILE Default XL
40.0L

0.0lbs
✈️ 47%
23.0x13.0x8.0in

81% Matching Features
0.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Exped Torrent 30
30.0L

2.5lbs
✈️ 77%
22.0x11.0x8.0in

81% Matching Features
10.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Patagonia Altvia Pack 28L
28.0L

1.8lbs
✈️ 19%
24.0x12.0x11.0in

81% Matching Features
12.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Osprey Hikelite 26
26.0L

1.62lbs
✈️ 90%
18.9x10.83x10.83in

81% Matching Features
14.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the HEIMPLANET Motion Ellipse 25
25.0L

2.0lbs
✈️ 38%
23.0x14.0x10.0in

81% Matching Features
15.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Ortlieb Atrack CR Urban
25.0L

2.9lbs
✈️ 38%
23.0x11.0x10.0in

81% Matching Features
15.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Ortlieb Atrack BP
25.0L

2.9lbs
✈️ 38%
23.0x11.0x10.0in

81% Matching Features
15.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the ILE Default
25.0L

218.3lbs
✈️ 80%
20.0x13.0x6.0in

81% Matching Features
15.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Exped Typhoon 25
25.0L

1.0lbs
✈️ 81%
20.0x12.0x8.0in

81% Matching Features
15.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the ILE ASNMNT
25.0L

0.0lbs
✈️ 30%
28.0x13.0x6.0in

81% Matching Features
15.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Exped Glissade 25 Women
25.0L

2.7lbs
✈️ 47%
23.0x11.0x9.0in

81% Matching Features
15.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Fjallraven High Coast Foldsack 24
24.0L

1.0lbs
✈️ 84%
18.0x11.0x8.0in

81% Matching Features
16.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Macpac Rapaki 22
22.0L

1.5lbs
✈️ 92%
4.0x4.0x4.0in

81% Matching Features
18.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the ILE Radius XL
40.0L

0.0lbs
✈️ 65%
21.0x13.0x8.0in

77% Matching Features
0.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Ortlieb Messenger Bag
39.0L

2.9lbs
✈️ 63%
20.0x16.0x6.0in

77% Matching Features
1.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35
35.0L

3.4lbs
✈️ 18%
26.0x13.0x11.0in

77% Matching Features
5.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison
Front facing view of the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 45L
45.0L

3.4lbs
✈️ 30%
24.0x11.0x8.0in

77% Matching Features
5.0L Difference in Capacity
Full Comparison