Thule Landmark 40L vs. Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L

Thule Landmark 40L

By: Thule Front facing view of the Thule Landmark 40L

Buy Now from Amazon

Size Details
Capacity 40L
Capacity per Weight 28.6L
Weight 1.4kg 3.17lbs High
Capacity per Kg 28.6 Low
Dimensions 56x34x26cm 56x34x26in
Cubic Space 49504cm 49504in
Capacity Diff 9 High
Airline Compatibility

✈️ 91% (182/199)

This bag can be used as a carry on in 91% of airlines.

Link to Manufacturer

Features

Storage
S Compression S
None Expanded Capacity None
Other Opening TopZip
Y Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
S Backpack S
N Frame N
1 Handles 1
H Hip Belt N
N Shoulder Strap N
S Sternum Strap S
Inside
1 Laptop 15
N Hydration N
3 Main Compartments 3
Y Organizer Y
N Shoe Compartment N
Outside
4 Lash Points 10
N Hard Shell N
N Molle N
N Rain-fly N
1 Water Bottle Holder 2
N Water Resistant Y
Material:
420D Dobby polyester, 600D polyester 630-denier 100% nylon, 450-denier 100% polyester

Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L

By: Patagonia Front facing view of the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L

Buy Now

Size Details
Capacity 32L
Capacity per Weight 35.6L
Weight 0.9kg 1.9lbs Low
Capacity per Kg 35.6 High
Dimensions 51x31x23cm 51x31x23in
Cubic Space 36363cm 36363in
Capacity Diff 4 Avg
Airline Compatibility

✈️ 97% (194/199)

This bag can be used as a carry on in 97% of airlines.

Link to Manufacturer