Osprey Porter 46 vs. Thule Landmark 40L

Osprey Porter 46

By: Osprey Front facing view of the Osprey Porter 46

Buy Now from Amazon

Size Details
Capacity 46L
Capacity per Weight 30.7L
Weight 1.5kg 3.3lbs High
Capacity per KgLbs 30.7 13.9 Low
Dimensions 56x36x23cm 23x15x10in
Cubic Space 46368cm³ 3450in³
Capacity Diff 0L Low
Airline Compatibility

✈️ 47% (94/199)

This bag can be used as a carry on in 47% of airlines.

Link to Manufacturer

Features

Storage
S Compression S
None Expanded Capacity None
TopZip Opening Other
N Passport Y
N Passthrough N
Carry
H Backpack S
N Frame N
2 Handles 1
H Hip Belt H
N Shoulder Strap N
H Sternum Strap S
Inside
1 Laptop 1
N Hydration N
3 Main Compartments 3
N Organizer Y
N Shoe Compartment N
Outside
0 Lash Points 4
N Hard Shell N
N Molle N
N Rain-fly N
0 Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant N
Material:
Nylon 420D Dobby polyester, 600D polyester

Thule Landmark 40L

By: Thule Front facing view of the Thule Landmark 40L

Buy Now from Amazon

Size Details
Capacity 40L
Capacity per Weight 28.6L
Weight 1.4kg 3.17lbs High
Capacity per KgLbs 28.6 12.6 Low
Dimensions 56x34x26cm 22x13x10in
Cubic Space 49504cm³ 2860in³
Capacity Diff 9L High
Airline Compatibility

✈️ 91% (182/199)

This bag can be used as a carry on in 91% of airlines.

Link to Manufacturer



Osprey Porter 46 vs Thule Landmark 40L

The Osprey Porter 46 is a spacious, well-built carry-on, designed for those who prefer hearty baggage options. It is large, coming in at 23 inches in height, 36 inches in width, and 56 inches in depth. Despite its bulk, it's surprisingly lightweight, weighing just under 1.5 pounds. The Porter is compatibility with 47% of airlines, making it a decent choice for the international roamer. Constructed from high-quality and durable nylon, it is ready to take on the elements. The pack has a laptop compartment that can fit any laptop up to 1 inch in thickness, and comes with an impressive 46 liters of carrying capacity.

Alternatively, the Thule Landmark 40L is a traveler's dream, known for its high compatibility with 91% of airlines. Slightly smaller than the Porter 46, the Landmark 40L measures 56 inches in height, 34 inches in width, and 26 inches in depth, making it more compact but still sufficient for most travelers. It is notably lighter than its counterpart, weighing in at 1.4 pounds. It’s fabricated using 420D Dobby polyester and 600D polyester, which ensures durability. The Landmark 40L also includes a laptop compartment for 1 inch devices and an overall carrying capacity of 40 liters.

Below are some of the key differences summarizing both packs:

  • Osprey Porter 46 is heavier yet provides more carrying space.
  • Thule Landmark 40L is lighter and has higher compatibility with airlines.
  • Porter 46 is made out of synthetic Nylon, while Landmark 40L is whipped from 420D Dobby Polyester and 600D Polyester.
  • Both feature laptop compartments that can accommodate a 1-inch thick device.
  • Porter 46 has less airport compatibility than Thule Landmark 40L.

Reviewers, on the whole, find both the Osprey Porter 46 and the Thule Landmark 40L to be solid choices for prospective buyers. The Porter pulls the praises for its ample storage space, supreme durability, and its practical clamshell opening. Its compression strap is appreciated for preventing the bag from appearing sloppy, while its reasonable weight for its size doesn't go unrecognized.

The Landmark 40L, on the other hand, pleases reviewers by accommodating a hidden straps feature that aids in efficient packing in tight spaces. Its helpful hip belt is lauded for promoting weight balance throughout the pack. Moreover, it garnishes commendations for its handy water bottle pocket and the SafeZone compartment's efficient organization.

To sum it up, both the Osprey Porter 46 and the Thule Landmark 40L prove to be fantastic carry-on backpack options. The Porter 46 edges it for those who favor a larger and durable pack, while the Landmark 40L is the optimal go-to for the practical traveler who values compact, lighter packs with efficient party planning.