Arc'teryx Blade 28 vs. Millican Fraser The Rucksack 32L

Arc'teryx Blade 28

By: Arc'teryx Front facing view of the Arc'teryx Blade 28

Buy Now from Amazon

Size Details
Capacity 28L
Capacity per Weight 18.7L
Weight 1.5kg 3.3lbs High
Capacity per KgLbs 18.7 8.5 Low
Dimensions 54x31x16cm 21x12x6in
Cubic Space 26784cm³ 1512in³
Capacity Diff -1L Low
Airline Compatibility

✈️ 98% (195/199)

This bag can be used as a carry on in 98% of airlines.

Link to Manufacturer

Features

Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
Clamshell Opening TopFlap
back Passport N
Y Passthrough N
Carry
H Backpack S
S Frame N
2 Handles 1
N Hip Belt R
N Shoulder Strap N
N Sternum Strap R
Inside
15 Laptop 15
N Hydration N
4 Main Compartments 2
Y Organizer N
N Shoe Compartment N
Outside
0 Lash Points 1
N Hard Shell N
N Molle N
N Rain-fly N
0 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material:
N210p-HT nylon 6,6 N630p-HT nylon 6,6 100% recycled polyester (RPET) yarn

Millican Fraser The Rucksack 32L

By: Millican Front facing view of the Millican Fraser The Rucksack 32L

Buy Now

Size Details
Capacity 32L
Capacity per Weight 24.6L
Weight 1.3kg 2.9lbs High
Capacity per KgLbs 24.6 11 Low
Dimensions 55x28x23cm 22x12x10in
Cubic Space 35420cm³ 2640in³
Capacity Diff 3L Avg
Airline Compatibility

✈️ 64% (127/199)

This bag can be used as a carry on in 64% of airlines.

Link to Manufacturer