Size Details
|
||
Capacity | 22L | |
Capacity per Weight | 12.9L | |
Weight | 1.7kg 3.7lbs | Avg |
Capacity per KgLbs | 12.9 5.9 | Low |
Dimensions | 40x28x21cm 15.7x11x7.9in | |
Cubic Space | 23520cm³ 1364.33in³ | |
Capacity Diff | 1L | Low |
✈️ 100% (198/199)
This bag can be used as a carry on in 100% of airlines.
Storage | ||
S | Compression | S |
None | Expanded Capacity | None |
TopZip | Opening | TopFlap |
side | Passport | N |
N | Passthrough | N |
Carry | ||
S | Backpack | S |
N | Frame | N |
2 | Handles | 1 |
N | Hip Belt | R |
N | Shoulder Strap | N |
S | Sternum Strap | R |
Inside | ||
15 | Laptop | 15 |
N | Hydration | N |
3 | Main Compartments | 3 |
Y | Organizer | N |
N | Shoe Compartment | N |
Outside | ||
0 | Lash Points | 0 |
N | Hard Shell | N |
N | Molle | N |
N | Rain-fly | N |
0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
Y | Water Resistant | Y |
Material: |
|
1000D Cordura | YKK AquaGuard zippers |
Size Details
|
||
Capacity | 20L | |
Capacity per Weight | 20L | |
Weight | 1kg 2.2lbs | Low |
Capacity per KgLbs | 20 9.1 | Low |
Dimensions | 42x31x17cm 16.5x12x6.5in | |
Cubic Space | 22134cm³ 1287.00in³ | |
Capacity Diff | 2L | Avg |
✈️ 99% (197/199)
This bag can be used as a carry on in 99% of airlines.
It's the age-old debate. Which would you prefer: The Greenroom136 Rainmaker or the YNOT Magnetica? The first thing to consider is the size. While both backpacks appear to be roughly the same height, the YNOT comes out a tad taller at 42 inches compared to the Greenroom136's 40 inches. Interestingly, the YNOT also edges out the Greenroom136 in terms of width. It is 31 inches wide, while the Greenroom136 is just 28 inches wide. Yet, when it comes to depth, the Greenroom136 boasts a generous 21 inches as opposed to the 17 inches offered by the YNOT.
Both bags have a capacity of 20 liters or more, but the Greenroom136 inches ahead with a 22-liter capacity, compared to the YNOT's 20 liters. That said, the YNOT magnetica wins in the weight category as it is only 1 pound, versus the 1.7 pounds of the Greenroom136.
Here are key comparison points to recap the above:
Reviewers overall seem thrilled with both products. Critics noticeable love the Greenroom136 for its customizability, sturdy, water-resistant exterior, and superior organizational features. On the other hand, the YNOT Magnetica's adaptations include weather resistance and expandable 26-liter capacity. These elements appeal to the practical minimalist looking for efficient everyday use and travel needs.
In the end, both the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the YNOT Magnetica present solid options for anyone in the market for a reliable and versatile carry-on backpack. Your ultimate choice will hinge on your individual preferences in terms of size, weight, capacity, and additional features. Happy backpacking!