LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag vs. Lander Commuter 25L Backpack
LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag
By: Life Behind Bars Jakarta (LBBJKT)
| Size Details
|
||
| Capacity | 35L | |
| Capacity per Weight | 21.9L | |
| Weight | 1.6kg 3.5lbs | Avg |
| Capacity per KgLbs | 21.9 10 | Low |
| Dimensions | 53x36x12cm 20.5x13.8x4.7in | |
| Cubic Space | 22896cm³ 1329.630in³ | |
| Capacity Diff | -12L | Low |
✈️ 98% (195/199)
This bag can be used as a carry on in 98% of airlines.
Features
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | S |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| Rolltop | Opening | TopZip |
| N | Passport | |
| N | Passthrough | |
| Carry | ||
| S | Backpack | S |
| N | Frame | N |
| 2 | Handles | 2 |
| R | Hip Belt | N |
| N | Shoulder Strap | N |
| S | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 17 | Laptop | 17 |
| N | Hydration | N |
| 5 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| N | Shoe Compartment | N |
| Outside | ||
| 1 | Lash Points | 1 |
| N | Hard Shell | N |
| N | Molle | N |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 2 | Water Bottle Holder | 1 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
|
Material: |
|
| 1000D CorduraLightweight water resistant polyester inner linings in bright yellowYKK Aquaguard zippers | CORDURA®, Nylon, Polyester, DWR Coating |
Lander Commuter 25L Backpack
By: Lander
| Size Details
|
||
| Capacity | 25L | |
| Capacity per Weight | 20.2L | |
| Weight | 1.24kg 2.7lbs | High |
| Capacity per KgLbs | 20.2 9.3 | Low |
| Dimensions | 53x32x18cm 21x13x8in | |
| Cubic Space | 30528cm³ 2184in³ | |
| Capacity Diff | 5L | Avg |
✈️ 80% (159/199)
This bag can be used as a carry on in 80% of airlines.
A tale of two backpacks, The Peloton Rolltop Bag by Life Behind Bars Jakarta (LBBJKT) and the Lander Commuter 25L Backpack by Lander. The LBBJKT stands tall, 53 inches, broad at 36 inches and 12 inches thick. In comparison, the Lander Commuter's dimensions are a less imposing 18 inches tall, 32 inches wide, and 53 inches deep. A fine point for the traveler preferring a less burdensome bag. The LBBJKT presents weighty substance weighing in at 1.6 pounds, while the Lander Commuter opts for a lighter touch at 1.24 pounds.
Comparison points include:
- The LBBJKT's hearty 35-liter capacity bucks against the Lander Commuter's more modest 25-litre offer.
- The LBBJKT stands firm with a 98% airline compatibility against Lander Commuter's 80%.
- Both backpacks offer a laptop compartment snug for a 17-inch companion.
Lovers of ruggedness might lean towards the LBBJKT, built of sturdy 1000D CorduraLightweight water resistant polyester inner linings in bright yellow and secure YKK Aquaguard zippers. In contrast, the Lander Commuter boasts a mix of CORDURA®, Nylon, Polyester, DWR Coating for a reliable exterior. Reviewer's words of praise resonate for both choices, the LBBJKT finding favor with cyclists, and the Lander garnering appreciation for its versatility. The Lander Commuter also was commended for its thoughtfully designed tech compartments and sleek urban/outdoor look that doesn't sacrifice functionality.
What makes each bag praiseworthy? The LBBJKT's expandability sets it apart. Need space? It swells from 35L to 45L without batting an eyelid, cradling a 17" laptop with ease, and its myriad pockets spell organization to the bone. Add the strap system for attaching oversized items, and you've got a winning hand. Lander Commuter counters with qualities hard to dismiss. Its sturdy construction promises longevity and the 'crash pad' tech section, padded, waterproofed, and designed with a false bottom speaks volumes about protection. Its functional pockets keep things orderly, and the cherry on the cake - it's remarkably comfortable for long hauls. In conclusion, both offer a wealth of benefits to consider when choosing a carry-on companion, making the task as daunting as picking A from B.