Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Cotopaxi Allpa 35L
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.5 kg |
| Dimensions | 51×30×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 80% |
| Price | $200 |
Feature by feature
| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| N | Compression | S |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 4 |
| Y | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| R | Hip Belt | S |
| S | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 15 | Laptop | 0 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1680D ballistic nylon paneling | 630-denier 100% nylon, 200-denier 100% polyester |
Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L
| Capacity | 32 L |
| Weight | 1.131 kg |
| Dimensions | 63×25×16 cm |
| Airline fit | 30% |
| Price | $169 |
The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L are both solid choices for the avid traveler, with specific benefits and strong points unique to each. The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L is a larger, bulkier pack and being 20 inches tall by 30 inches wide puts it at the higher end of carry-on allowance on many airlines. While larger packs often result in additional heft, the Allpa 35L manages to keep its weight at a reasonable 1.5 pounds. Equipped with a generous 35-litre capacity, a solid 1680D ballistic nylon build, and a laptop pocket that comfortably shelters a 15-inch laptop, this pack is prepared for the rigors of travel.
The Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L, on the other hand, is a bit more compact and lighter. Measuring 16 inches tall and 25 inches wide, it is more likely to fit under your airplane seat than in the overhead bin, thus reducing its airline compatibility. Despite its slightly lighter weight at 1.131 pounds and lesser capacity at 32 liters, the Cragsmith Pack 32L is not to be overlooked. With a combination of 630-denier 100% nylon and 200-denier 100% polyester, the backpack is still plenty sturdy, albeit with a less spacious laptop pocket.
The primary differences between these two robust packs are summarized below:
- Size: The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L is larger overall, with greater dimensions and more packing volume.
- Weight: The Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L is lighter than its Cotopaxi counterpart.
- Material: The Allpa 35L is made of solely 1680D ballistic nylon paneling, while the Cragsmith combines two types of denier nylon and polyester for added strength and durability.
- Laptop compartment: Only the Allpa 35L pack comes with a compartment capable of holding a 15-inch laptop, the Cragsmith Pack 32L does not have this feature.
- Airline compatibility: Cotopaxi Allpa 35L is compatible with a larger percentage of airlines than the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L.
Reviewers consistently praise the Cotopaxi Allpa's intuitive design and useful internal organization. Customer feedback suggests it's incredibly easy to use and terrific for both urban and outdoorsy travelers. For the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L, the emphasis is put on its sturdiness and useful access to the main compartment from both the top and the back panel. Given these features and the included Ironclad Guarantee, people appreciate this backpack's reliability. In conclusion, these packs both offer great benefits – but depend on the specfic needs of the traveller. The larger, more capacious Cotopaxi Allpa 35L is ideal for those who venture far and travel light. Conversely, The Patagonia Cragsmith 32L, with its exceptional sturdiness and practical accessibility, is perfect for travelers who value ease of access and durability.