Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.5 kg |
| Dimensions | 51×30×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 80% |
| Price | $200 |
| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | 5.11 Rush 12 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 4 |
| Y | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| R | Hip Belt | R |
| S | Sternum Strap | R |
| Inside | ||
| 15 | Laptop | 15 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 16 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1680D ballistic nylon paneling | Water-resistant 1050D nylon |
| Capacity | 24 L |
| Weight | 1.2 kg |
| Dimensions | 46×28×17 cm |
| Airline fit | 100% |
| Price | $100 |
Pitting the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L against the 5.11 Rush 12 presents an intriguing comparison. Both bring unique strengths to the table and fit different travel needs. The Allpa 35L, made of 1680D ballistic nylon panelling, combines durability with style and practicality, and weighs a negligible 1.5 pounds. It vaunts a neat internal organization, accommodates a 15-inch laptop, and, with a 35 liter capacity, has room to spare for the long-haul traveller. However, it falters somewhat in terms of airline compatibility, with acceptance by only 80% of companies.
In comparison, the 5.11 Rush 12 is a more streamlined bag, with height, width, and depth dimensions slightly smaller than the Allpa 35L. It matches the Allpa's laptop accommodation, and beneath its water-resistant 1050D nylon exterior lies a 24 liter capacity which, while less, is still ample for most urban excursions. At 1.2 pounds, it's marginally lighter, and, crucially, ticks off the full 100% in terms of airline compatibility.
It's clear that both the Allpa and the Rush 12 have their respective fan followings. Reviewers laud the Allpa's internal organization, citing it as the bag's strongest feature, and suitable for a range of outdoor and urban adventures. Others were won over by its durability, revealing that it held up well in various challenging conditions.
The Rush 12 also receives positive reviews, with users praising its longevity and build quality. Its high degree of customizability with molle attachments, capacious front compartment, and lighter weight make it a user-friendly choice for many.
Of course, any decision to buy should take into account specific requirements. Those prioritizing packing capacity, comfort, and added accessories may gravitate toward the Allpa 35L. If, on the other hand, durability, airline compatibility, and a more accommodative front compartment hold sway, then it's the 5.11 Rush 12 that takes the cake.