Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 vs. Osprey Quasar 28L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23
Capacity23 L
Weight0.65 kg
Dimensions43×26×12 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$135

Feature by feature

Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23FeatureOsprey Quasar 28L
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
2 Opening 0
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 2
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Bergshell®: 400D 100% polyamide210/420/630D Nylon Dobby Blend

Osprey Quasar 28L

Front facing view of the Osprey Quasar 28L
Capacity28 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions34×28×6 cm
Airline fit99%
Price$149

Key differences between the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 and Osprey Quasar 28L

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 181 accept both. 0 accept only the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23, and 6 accept only the Osprey Quasar 28L.

Only the Osprey Quasar 28L fits

LC Perú, Lion Air Group, Spring Airlines, VivaColombia, Volaris, Wizz Air.

Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 vs. Osprey Quasar 28L: which should you pack?

The Osprey Quasar 28L carries 5L more than the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 (23L vs. 28L), while the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 is the lighter pack at 0.65kg (vs. 0.8kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Osprey Quasar 28L fits 99% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Osprey Quasar 28L; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 is the better call.