Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 vs. Kathmandu Hybrid 70L Trolley

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35
Capacity35 L
Weight1.55 kg
Dimensions65×32×27 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$185

Feature by feature

Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35FeatureKathmandu Hybrid 70L Trolley
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
Y Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap N
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
Y Rain-fly optional
2 Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant N
Material
G-1000® Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton 100% polyamide 500DPolyester, Nylon

Kathmandu Hybrid 70L Trolley

Front facing view of the Kathmandu Hybrid 70L Trolley
Capacity70 L
Weight3.42 kg
Dimensions79×40×34 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$300

Key differences between the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 and Kathmandu Hybrid 70L Trolley

Both have: compression straps, hip belt.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 1 accept both. 1 accept only the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35, and 0 accept only the Kathmandu Hybrid 70L Trolley.

Only the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 fits

Virgin America.

Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 vs. Kathmandu Hybrid 70L Trolley: which should you pack?

The Kathmandu Hybrid 70L Trolley carries 35L more than the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 (35L vs. 70L), while the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 is the lighter pack at 1.55kg (vs. 3.42kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 fits 1% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Kathmandu Hybrid 70L Trolley; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 is the better call.