Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 vs. Osprey Farpoint® Travel Pack 70

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35
Capacity35 L
Weight1.55 kg
Dimensions65×32×27 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$185

Feature by feature

Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35FeatureOsprey Farpoint® Travel Pack 70
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
Y Hip Belt removable
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
Y Rain-fly Y
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
G-1000® Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton 100% polyamide 500D210D Nylon Mini Hex Diamond Ripstop

Osprey Farpoint® Travel Pack 70

Front facing view of the Osprey Farpoint® Travel Pack 70
Capacity67 L
Weight1.7 kg
Dimensions61×34×34 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$200

Key differences between the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 and Osprey Farpoint® Travel Pack 70

Both have: compression straps, sternum strap, rain cover, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 2 accept both. Every airline that takes one takes the other.

Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 vs. Osprey Farpoint® Travel Pack 70: which should you pack?

The Osprey Farpoint® Travel Pack 70 carries 32L more than the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 (35L vs. 67L), while the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 is the lighter pack at 1.55kg (vs. 1.7kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 fits 1% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Osprey Farpoint® Travel Pack 70; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 is the better call.