Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Patagonia Arbor Roll Top Pack 30L
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Greenroom136 Rainmaker
| Capacity | 22 L |
| Weight | 1.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 40×28×21 cm |
| Airline fit | 100% |
| Price | $120 |
Feature by feature
| Greenroom136 Rainmaker | Feature | Patagonia Arbor Roll Top Pack 30L |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 2 |
| side | Passport | Y |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| S | Backpack | S |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| S | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside | ||
| 15 | Laptop | 15 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1000D Cordura | 600-denier 100% recycled polyester, 00-denier 100% recycled polyester |
Patagonia Arbor Roll Top Pack 30L
| Capacity | 30 L |
| Weight | 0.66 kg |
| Dimensions | 69×30×17 cm |
| Airline fit | 19% |
| Price | $129 |
Meet the contenders in this carry-on backpack comparison: the versatile Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the timeless designed Patagonia Arbor Roll Top Pack 30L. Both bags promise high utility with an impressive capacity and laptop compartments, but they each come with their unique characteristics. The Rainmaker, towering at 40 inches, is constructed with 1000D Cordura ensuring robustness and water resistance. Weighing only 1.7 pounds, its storage capacity is an impressive 22 liters. This backpack is touted as "a solid pack that values function above all else," enabling users to be creative with its customizability options.
On the contrary, the Arbor Roll Top is an environment-friendly option made with 600-denier 100% recycled polyester. Despite being lighter at 0.66 pounds, it boasts a higher capacity of 30 liters. Its unique feature that stands out is the convenient side access to the laptop sleeve, eliminating the need to undo the rolltop just to grab your laptop. This gives it a classy, timeless design perfect for both work and play settings.
- Height: Greenroom136 Rainmaker (40") vs Patagonia Arbor Roll Top Pack 30L (17")
- Width: Greenroom136 Rainmaker (28") vs Patagonia Arbor Roll Top Pack 30L (30")
- Depth: Greenroom136 Rainmaker (21") vs Patagonia Arbor Roll Top Pack 30L (69")
- Weight: Greenroom136 Rainmaker (1.7 lbs) vs Patagonia Arbor Roll Top Pack 30L (0.66 lbs)
- Capacity: Greenroom136 Rainmaker (22L) vs Patagonia Arbor Roll Top Pack 30L (30L)
- Materials: Greenroom136 Rainmaker (1000D Cordura) vs Patagonia Arbor Roll Top Pack 30L (600-denier 100% recycled polyester)
- Laptop Compartment Size: Both can fit 15" laptop
- Airlines Compatibility: Greenroom136 Rainmaker (100%) vs Patagonia Arbor Roll Top Pack 30L (19%)
- Reviewer's Quote: Greenroom136 Rainmaker ("Overall, it’s a solid pack that values function above all else.") vs Patagonia Arbor Roll Top Pack 30L ("A classy and timeless design that would fit in work and/or play settings.")
In conclusion, both backpacks are strong contenders for anyone in the market for an all-around carry-on. Greenroom136’s Rainmaker is your perfect match if you’re after high customization, sturdiness, and excellent water resistance. For those looking for a more environmentally-friendly option that still packs in a higher capacity and convenient laptop access, the Patagonia Arbor Roll Top is the way to go. Both brands offer outstanding value, as summarized by a reviewer who declares the Rainmaker one of the best value bags in the market and praises the Arbor Roll Top's ability to pack more than it seems it can. The decision lies in your hands, but rest assured, either choice won't disappoint.