Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Fjallraven Travel Pack
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Cotopaxi Allpa 35L
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.5 kg |
| Dimensions | 51×30×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 80% |
| Price | $200 |
Feature by feature
| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Fjallraven Travel Pack |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 1 |
| Y | Passport | Y |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | H |
| R | Hip Belt | N |
| S | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside | ||
| 15 | Laptop | 15 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 2 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1680D ballistic nylon paneling | G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton |
Fjallraven Travel Pack
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.65 kg |
| Dimensions | 46×32×27 cm |
| Airline fit | 30% |
| Price | $225 |
The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and the Fjallraven Travel Pack are both great options for a carry on backpack, but they have some key differences. Starting from the outside, the Cotopaxi is made of hardwearing ballistic nylon while the Fjallraven uses a combination of polyester and cotton in its G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco fabric. This gives the Fjallraven a softer, more casual aesthetic while the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L sports a more technical look.
Both bags offer ample space, each boasting a 35-liter capacity. Notably, however, the Fjallraven Travel Pack is a bit taller and wider, but not as deep as the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L. Reviewers have enjoyed the intuitiveness of the Cotopaxi’s organization system, but others have praised the Fjallraven's sleek and secure design, including its all-around padding which keeps your gear safe on the move.
- Size: The Fjallraven is slightly larger but less deep than Cotopaxi.
- Weight: The Fjallraven weighs slightly more.
- Material: Cotopaxi uses ballistic nylon, while Fjallraven uses a polyester/cotton blend.
- Design: Cotopaxi has a more technical appearance, while Fjallraven has a softer, more casual look.
- Airline Compatibility: Cotopaxi is compatible with 80% of airlines, while the Fjallraven is only compatible with 30%.
While they may differ in size and style, both bags are equally well-thought-out in their designs. They each include a laptop compartment that fits a 15 inch laptop, several pockets for organization, and comfortable shoulder straps. However, it's worth noting that the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L includes a rain cover and additional accessories like a collapsible mesh laundry bag and a nylon shoe bag. On the other hand, the Fjallraven Travel Pack shines in its elegant simplicity, with notable features such as stowable shoulder straps and a top pocket that is accessible from the outside, making it easy to grab your essentials while on the go.
In sum, the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Fjallraven Travel Pack each have their strengths. The Cotopaxi's durable material and additional bonuses might make it the better option for those anticipating rougher use, where the Fjallraven is better suited for those desiring a more stylish and comfortable option. Both represent excellent choices for the avid traveler. As always, consider your personal travel style and needs before making your pick.