Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.5 kg |
| Dimensions | 51×30×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 80% |
| Price | $200 |
| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Briggs & Riley Large Cargo Backpack |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 4 |
| Y | Passport | Y |
| N | Passthrough | Y |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| R | Hip Belt | N |
| S | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside | ||
| 15 | Laptop | 17 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 2 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 1 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1680D ballistic nylon paneling | 1600D ballistic nylon outer fabric |
| Capacity | 33 L |
| Weight | 1.4 kg |
| Dimensions | 48.5×38×20.5 cm |
| Airline fit | 52% |
| Price | $349 |
The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and the Briggs & Riley Large Cargo Backpack are both exceptional for traveling, but they do have some differences. The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L offers a larger capacity with it being able to store 35 liters and the Briggs & Riley Large Cargo Backpack slightly behind with 33 liters. Cotopaxi Allpa 35L, being compatible with 80% of airlines, affords a wider sense of accessibility for the travelers compared to the Briggs & Riley Large Cargo backpack with it being compatible with only 52% of airlines.
Here are some significant differences between the two:
The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L, made of 1680D ballistic nylon paneling, makes for a long-lasting bag. One can't overlook its internal organization; it brings along some intuitive and helpful features that cater to a user's travel needs. Comfort is also at the forefront of their design with comfortable shoulder straps, a hip belt, and adjustable sternum straps. Not to mention, it comes with a handy slew of accessories: a collapsible mesh laundry bag, a nylon shoe bag, and a mesh water bottle sleeve.
The Briggs & Riley Large Cargo Backpack, contrarily, is designed with 1600D ballistic nylon outer fabric and feels premium to the touch, thanks to the leather detailing. Its most promising features include the front pocket, which offers abundant organization, and the back padding for good ventilation. This backpack also guards against unauthorized access to sensitive information with its RFID pocket with discreet credit card holders. Overall, both packs deliver on their promises, and the decision ultimately boils down to personal preferences and travel needs.