Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.5 kg |
| Dimensions | 51×30×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 80% |
| Price | $200 |
| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Exped Serac 35 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 2 |
| Y | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| R | Hip Belt | R |
| S | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 15 | Laptop | 0 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1680D ballistic nylon paneling | 400 D HD ripstop nylon, TPU film laminated, 10'000 mm water column |
The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and the Exped Serac 35 are both carry-on backpacks, each with its distinct features and advantages that make use in various situations. With an overall size of 20 inches tall, 30 inches wide, and 51 inches deep, the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L weighs in at 1.5 pounds, making it a bit more substantial than its counterpart, the Exped Serac 35, which measures 23 inches tall, 30 inches wide, and 62 inches deep, and weighs only 0.82 pounds. However, both bags offer an impressive 35-liter capacity, ensuring ample space for packing necessities.
Here’s a summary of the key differences:
When it comes to functionality, reviewers have praised the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L for its exceptional internal organization, highlighting its intuitive and helpful configuration. Quotes from users suggest this backpack is an ideal choice for those seeking convenience, comfort, and durability. Notably, the included rain cover not only offers protection from the elements, but it also offers an extra layer of security. Additional features that make this bag more enticing include comfortable straps and included accessories like a collapsible mesh laundry bag, nylon shoe bag, and mesh water bottle sleeve.
Meanwhile, the Exped Serac 35 is rated highly for its weatherproof construction, making it a perfect choice for outdoor trips and activities. Users have found its lightweight yet durable construction useful for long-term use. Furthermore, the side access to the main compartment has been noted for its convenience, especially when retrieving items from the bottom or middle of the pack. Lastly, the various attachment points for outdoor gear are a plus for travelers with numerous belongings. Despite its lack of a laptop compartment, it's a durable, practical choice for outdoor enthusiasts.