Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Cotopaxi Allpa 35L

Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L
Capacity35 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions51×30×20 cm
Airline fit80%
Price$200

Feature by feature

Cotopaxi Allpa 35LFeatureCotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
Y Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
H Backpack S
R Hip Belt N
S Sternum Strap S
Inside
15 Laptop 15
3 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
0 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
1680D ballistic nylon paneling100% repurposed 600D polyester

Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L

Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L
Capacity26 L
Weight0.7 kg
Dimensions53×33×23 cm
Airline fit65%
Price$110

The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L by Cotopaxi is a backpack designed for light, easy travel. Crafted from high-durability 1680D ballistic nylon paneling, it provides 35 liters of carrying capacity coupled with a streamlined and intuitive internal organization. This backpack weighs in at 1.5 pounds and its dimensions are 20x30x51 inches, offering ample space for your belongings. The Allpa is widely reputed for its suitability as a carry-on bag with 80% of airlines, highlighting its versatility and adaptability.

The Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L, also by Cotopaxi, is a lighter and slightly smaller alternative. Comprised of 100% repurposed 600D polyester, this backpack offers a reduced carrying capacity of 26 liters, yet retains the same intuitive organization as its larger counterpart. The Cusco Backpack is lighter, weighing just 0.7 pounds, and is compatible with 65% of airlines. Its dimensions are slightly larger at 23x33x53 inches.

Below is a succinct comparison:

Both backpacks have a separate compartment that can snugly fit a 15-inch laptop, adding to their functionality. While the Allpa 35L is praised for the robustness of its build and intuitive internal organization, the Cusco 26L also gains recognition for its sleek design, lightness, and value for money.

The notable difference lies in their size, material, and weight. The Allpa 35L, being larger and slightly heavier, might be your go-to if you're after more carrying capacity. Its ballistic nylon paneling also promises durability and longevity. On the other hand, the lighter Cusco 26L, while slightly smaller, is a solid choice if you're favoring a more eco-friendly option due to its repurposed polyester material. Ultimately, your choice between the Allpa 35L and the Cusco 26L depends on your specific travel needs and preferences.