Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Exped Transit 40
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Cotopaxi Allpa 35L
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.5 kg |
| Dimensions | 51×30×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 80% |
| Price | $200 |
Feature by feature
| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Exped Transit 40 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| N | Compression | S |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 0 |
| Y | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | R |
| R | Hip Belt | N |
| S | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 15 | Laptop | 0 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 0 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1680D ballistic nylon paneling | 840 D Oxford nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water column Oeko-Tex 100 certified |
The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Exped Transit 40 are both excellent choices, but they cater to somewhat different needs and preferences.
The Allpa 35L by Cotopaxi is a sturdy, rugged backpack built for surprise showers and rough handling with its 1680D ballistic nylon paneling and included rain cover. The bag's structure is well-thought-out, with an internal organization system deemed intuitive by many users. It also accommodates a 15-inch laptop in a dedicated compartment, underscoring its practicality. A bundle of versatile extras—like a collapsible mesh laundry bag, nylon shoe bag, and a mesh water bottle sleeve—make it a handy companion for every kind of traveler.
- In contrast, Exped's Transit 40 is a larger pack offering a roomier 40 liters of storage. It’s noteworthy lighter than the Allpa 35L and its 840 D Oxford Nylon body is water-resistant, making it durable. The interior of this pack is decent, functional, and can fit more travel requirements. A notable distinction is its ability to switch between a duffel bag and a backpack, offering adaptability to different travel styles. However, it lacks a dedicated laptop compartment, which could be a dealbreaker for some digital nomads or business travelers.
Here’s a bullet-point comparison:
- Dimensions: The Allpa is smaller (20x30x51 inches) compared to the Transit 40 (25x33x60 inches).
- Weight: The Transit 40 is lighter (0.8 pounds) than the Allpa 35L (1.5 pounds).
- Capacity: The Transit 40 offers more volume (40 liters) against the Allpa 35L's (35 liters).
- Airline Compatibility: The Transit 40 trumps with 91% airline compatibility, while the Allpa 35L is compatible with 80%.
- Material: The Allpa 35L is made of 1680D ballistic nylon. The Transit 40 is made of 840 D Oxford nylon, PU coated.
- Laptop Compartment: The Allpa 35L fits a 15 inch laptop. The Transit 40 lacks this feature.
The Allpa 35L scores high for comfort, offering plush shoulder straps, a hip belt, and adjustable sternum straps. It's applauded by users and reviewers for its simplicity, comfort, and durability. On the other hand, the Transit 40 makes its mark with its versatility, doubling as a duffel bag, and its durable make promises longevity. Therefore, the choice between the Allpa 35L and the Transit 40 depends on whether you prioritize comfort and organization or versatility and capacity.