Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Cotopaxi Allpa 35L
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.3 kg |
| Dimensions | 56×30×25 cm |
| Airline fit | 26% |
| Price | $225 |
Feature by feature
| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| front | Passport | N |
| Y | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| hideable | Backpack | Y |
| hideable | Hip Belt | removable |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside | ||
| 15in | Laptop | N |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 1, side | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 100% recycled 840D TPU-coated nylon | 420d HD nylon plain weave |
Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack
| Capacity | 32 L |
| Weight | 0 kg |
| Dimensions | 53×32×30 cm |
| Airline fit | 12% |
| Price | $120 |
If you're a frequent traveler looking for a robust and versatile backpack, Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and the Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 can both be interesting options. The Cotopaxi Allpa stands out for its spacious capacity of 35 litres, enough to support your extensive travel. One of its perks is the laptop compartment that can fit a 15-inch laptop, making it ideal for digital nomads or traveling professionals. Weighing just 1.5 pounds, it's surprisingly light for its capability, with the 1680D ballistic nylon making it sturdy and long-lasting. With 80% airline compatibility, it won't let you down at the boarding gate.
On the other hand, the Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack appeals to those in need of a lighter, more compact option. Despite it being unable to host any laptop, it offers a hydration bladder that could double as a laptop sleeve. Furthermore, the Mantis 32 Backpack features durable 420d HD nylon plain weave material. It's significantly taller and wider than the Cotopaxi model; however, the reduced capacity might restrict packing for longer journeys.
In summary, here's how they both stack up:
- Dimensions: Cotopaxi stands at 20" tall, 30" wide, and 51" deep, while Arc'Teryx sizes up at 30" tall, 32"wide, and 53" deep.
- Weight: The Cotopaxi weighs 1.5lbs, whereas the Arc'Teryx weighs significantly less.
- Capacity: Cotopaxi has a larger capacity of 35L, with the Arc'Teryx offering 32L.
- Laptop compatibility: Only the Cotopaxi features a laptop compartment.
- Airline compatibility: Cotopaxi is compatible with 80% of airlines, while Arc'Teryx only covers up to 30%.
- Material: Cotopaxi is made of 1680D ballistic nylon, while Arc'Teryx is composed of 420d HD nylon.
When it comes to user praise, both options seem to be well-loved for their own reasons. The Cotopaxi Allpa is renowned for its internal organisation; reviewers commented on how "comfortable, easy, and durable" it is. Not only is it recommended as a graduation gift for traveling seniors, but its extra benefits such as a rain cover, collapsible mesh laundry bag, and comfortable shoulder straps also receive special mentions.
In contrast, the Arc'Teryx Mantis 32 Backpack is admired for its lightweight build and durability. Although it only comes in a 26L option and lacks a designated laptop compartment, users seem to find value in its cleverly designed hydration bladder's dual-functionality and undeniable lightness. Both backpacks have their unique strengths and justify their place in the market. It's up to you to decide which fits your needs best.