Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Thule Crossover 32L
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Cotopaxi Allpa 35L
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.5 kg |
| Dimensions | 51×30×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 80% |
| Price | $200 |
Feature by feature
| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Thule Crossover 32L |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| N | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 0 |
| Y | Passport | Y |
| N | Passthrough | |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| R | Hip Belt | N |
| S | Sternum Strap | N |
| Inside | ||
| 15 | Laptop | 15 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1680D ballistic nylon paneling | Dobby nylon |
Taking a trek into the realm of carry-on capable backpacks, we've got two royals in this field - the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and the Thule Crossover 32L. These two leave much to discuss. First, our Cotopaxi contender is built and fit for versatile use. Crafted with 1680D ballistic nylon paneling, it's got its armour. Its dimensions, 20 inches tall, 30 inches wide, and 51 inches deep ensure plenty internal space. Adding to that, a 15-inch laptop pocket, this 1.5-pound beast fights for the spotlight. Rightfully so, with 35 liters of cargo space, and an airline compatibility of 80%. It's a reliable companion indeed.
Still, there's the Thule Crossover 32L that's not without its merits Being slightly lighter at 1 pound, it might appeal to those who appreciate less physical strain. Manufactured in Dobby nylon, it's hardy. Size-wise, it pulls ahead with a towering 47 inches height, 31 inches width and 32 inches depth. It also paves a smoother air journey, being compatible with 89% of airlines. And, like its opponent, it houses your 15-inch laptops snugly.
The duo stands head-to-head, each with their distinct forte. Here's a summary of their notable differences:
- The Cotopaxi, heavier by a half pound, outshines with a slightly larger internal volume (35L vs 32L)',
- The Thule Crossover takes the lead with greater overall dimensions, offering more space in depth.
- The Cotopaxi is made with 1680D ballistic nylon paneling, arguably tougher than Thule's Dobby nylon.
- However, the Thule Crossover ascends with a wider airline compatibility.
In the sea of raving reviews, the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L prides itself as an easy, comfortable, and durable carry-on, noted for its 'intuitive and helpful' internal organization. One reviewer counted it the 'perfect graduation gift for budding world travelers.' Alternatively, the Thule receives praise for its massive capacity, reliability, and versatility. Touted as the 'perfect laptop backpack', its most promising feature is a hard-shell accessory pouch for fragile items.
In conclusion, both backpacks put up a formidable fight. The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L, with its variety of useful included accessories and unique rain cover, provides comfort and security. In contrast, the Thule Crossover 32L shines for its reliability and harder external shell. Buy what suits you best; you can't go wrong with either choice.