Cotopaxi Allpa 35L vs. Timbuk2 Blink

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Cotopaxi Allpa 35L

Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L
Capacity35 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions51×30×20 cm
Airline fit80%
Price$200

Feature by feature

Cotopaxi Allpa 35LFeatureTimbuk2 Blink
Storage
N Compression S
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 0
Y Passport front
N Passthrough N
Carry
H Backpack S
R Hip Belt N
S Sternum Strap N
Inside
15 Laptop 15
3 Main Compartments 3
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
0 Water Bottle Holder
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
1680D ballistic nylon paneling

Timbuk2 Blink

Front facing view of the Timbuk2 Blink
Capacity24 L
Weight0.7 kg
Dimensions54×28×10 cm
Airline fit99%
Price$140

The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and the Timbuk2 Blink are both notable options in the carry-on backpack market. Among their shared features, they both have a laptop compartment that fits up to a 15-inch device. Nevertheless, unique traits also distinguish these two packs.

The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L is characterized by its larger size and weight in comparison to the Timbuk2 Blink. With dimensions of 20 inches tall, 30 inches wide, and 51 inches deep, it packs in a whopping 35 liters of capacity, lending itself to trips away for longer durations. Despite the noted weight of 1.5 pounds, this heft is justified by the durable 1680D ballistic nylon paneling and a grab-and-go list of essential features: a rain cover, collapsible mesh laundry bag, nylon shoe bag, and a mesh water bottle sleeve, to name a few.

Conversely, the Timbuk2 Blink takes on a different approach. It's slender and lightweight, coming in at only 0.7 pounds with dimensions of 54 inches tall, 28 inches wide, and 10 inches deep. The carry capacity is slightly reduced at 24 liters, but its airline compatibility outdoes the Allpa 35L at 99% compared to 80%. A lack of rain cover leaves the bag slightly vulnerable, but a high degree of quality in the bag's material helps to offset this. Additionally, the Blink features a sleeker, minimal design, and the clamshell style makes it easy to pack and unpack.

Drawing up a quick side-by-side comparison:

Given the nuances of each pack, it comes down to what best suits the traveler’s needs. One needs to weigh in the value of larger capacity and durability against lighter weight and greater compatibility with airlines. Additional features such as the convenient packing style of the Blink compared to the added accessories of the Allpa 35L also come into the equation; it ultimately boils down to the personal travel style and needs of the individual wearer. Both backpacks certainly hold their own distinction in the carry-on realm and are well worth considering.