Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.5 kg |
| Dimensions | 51×30×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 80% |
| Price | $200 |
| Cotopaxi Allpa 35L | Feature | Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| N | Compression | S |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 1 |
| Y | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| H | Backpack | S |
| R | Hip Belt | S |
| S | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 15 | Laptop | 15 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | R |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1680D ballistic nylon paneling | 420HD Nylon Packcloth |
| Capacity | 55 L |
| Weight | 1.9 kg |
| Dimensions | 73×36×23 cm |
| Airline fit | 88% |
| Price | $220 |
The Cotopaxi Allpa 35L and Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 are two robust and functional contenders in the realm of carry-on backpacks. The former weighs a mere 1.5 pounds, and while being relatively compact at 20x30 inches, it still manages to pack an impressive 35 liters in terms of volume. The paneling made from 1680D ballistic nylon is a rugged wheelhouse and offers outstanding durability. As a true companion for the modern-day explorer, it's absolutely airline friendly - being compatible with about 80% of them. It additionally sports a compartment that's just right for a 15-inch laptop.
In contrast, the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 brings more bulk to the table, tipping the scales at 1.9 pounds and reaching a volume of 55 liters - being 20% more airline compatible. Made with 420HD Nylon Packcloth, it's a hardy competitor and every bit as equipped for modern travel with the same laptop capacity. Standing taller than the Cotopaxi at 23 inches, the Farpoint's greater width and depth (36x73 inches respectively) may swing your decision if size matters.
Here's a point-by-point comparison -
Dimensions: The Cotopaxi measures 20x30 inches, whereas the Osprey’s measurements are 23x36 inches.
Weight: The Cotopaxi is lighter at 1.5 pounds, while the Osprey weighs in at 1.9 pounds.
Capacity: The Cotopaxi packs 35 liters, whereas Osprey bags the game with a 55 liters capacity.
Material: The Cotopaxi uses 1680D ballistic nylon paneling while the Osprey boasts of 420HD Nylon Packcloth.
Airline Compatibility: Cotopaxi ties in with 80% airlines, meanwhile Osprey links with 88% of them.
Laptop Compartment: Both bags have compartments that can fit a 15-inch laptop.
Reviewers rave about the Cotopaxi for its internal organization, simplicity, durability and suitability for both urban and outdoor excursions. On the other hand, the Osprey scores high for its round-the-world travel suitability, versatility and overall quality and durability.
When you consider additional features, the Cotopaxi impresses with its protective rain cover, comfortable straps, and the inclusion of extra bags for shoes and laundry. The Osprey has charming features too, such as the AirCover for added protection, compatibility with the Osprey Daylite daypack for increased functionality, an adjustable, well-padded harness system, and hip belt pockets for convenience.
In conclusion, the Cotopaxi Allpa 35L is a compact and light navigational buddy tailored to suit urban explorers who crave order, durability and a low-carbon footprint. Meanwhile, the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 is a larger, heavier duty carry-on built with round-the-world adventurers in mind who value versatility and extra storage.