LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag vs. Thule Landmark 40L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag

Front facing view of the LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag
Capacity35 L
Weight1.6 kg
Dimensions53×36×12 cm
Airline fit81%
Price$170

Feature by feature

LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop BagFeatureThule Landmark 40L
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
2 Opening 0
N Passport Y
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt hideable
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
17in Laptop 1in
5 Main Compartments 3
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant N
Material
1000D CorduraLightweight water resistant polyester inner linings in bright yellowYKK Aquaguard zippers420D Dobby polyester, 600D polyester

Thule Landmark 40L

Front facing view of the Thule Landmark 40L
Capacity40 L
Weight1.4 kg
Dimensions56×34×26 cm
Airline fit6%
Price$149

Key differences between the LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag and Thule Landmark 40L

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, sternum strap, built-in organizer.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 11 accept both. 142 accept only the LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag, and 0 accept only the Thule Landmark 40L.

Only the LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag fits

Aegean Airlines, Aer Lingus, Aeroflot, Aeromexico, Air Asia, Air Astana, Air Baltic, Air Canada, Air Caraibes, Air China, Air Europa, Air Koryo, Air Macau, Air Malta, Air Nostrum, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Tahiti Nui, Air Wisconsin, AirAsiaX, Alaska Airlines, All Nipon Airways, Allegiant Air, American Airlines, ANA, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Atlas Global, Austrian, Avianca , Azerbaijan Airlines, Azul Linhas, Bahamasair, Bangkok Airways, Biman Bangladesh, Blue Air, British Airways, Brussels Airlines, Bulgaria Air, Cambodia Angkor Air, Caribbean Airlines, Cathay Pacific, Cebu Pacific, China Airlines, China Eastern, China Southern, CommutAir, Conviasa, Croatia Air, Cubana de Aviacion, Czech Airlines, Delta Airlines, Dragonair, EL AL, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Ethiopian Airlines, Eurowings, EVA Air, Fiji Airways, Finnair, Flair Air, Garuda Indonesia, Gol Linhas Aereas, Hainan Airlines, Hawaiian Airlines, Hong Kong Airlines, Iberia, Icelandair, Interjet, Iran Air, Iran Aseman Air, Japan Airlines, Jet2, jetBlue Airways, Jetstar Airways, Jetstar Asia, Juneyao Airlines, Korean Air, Kulula, Kuwait Air, Liat Airlines, LOT Polish, Lufthansa, Luxair, Mahan Air, Malaysia Airlines, Mango, Meridiana Fly, Mesa Airlines, Middle East Airlines, Monarch Airlines, Nordwind Airlines, Norwegian, Onur Air, Pakistan International, Peach, Philippine Airlines, Porter Airlines, Qantas Airways, Republic Airways, Royal Air Morocco, Royal Brunei Airlines, Ryanair, S7, SAS Scandinavian, Saudi Arabian Airlines, Scoot, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sichuan Airlines, SilkAir, Silver Airways, Singapore Airlines, Skywest, Inc., South African Airways, SpiceJet, SriLankan Airlines, Sun Express, Swiss Int'l Air Lines, TAAG Angola, TAM Airlines, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Thai Airways, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), Tiger Airways, Trans States, Travel Service Airlines, TUI, Turkish Airlines, Ukraine International, United Airlines, Ural Airlines, Uzbekistan Air, Vietnam Airlines, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Atlantic, Volotea, WestJet, WOW Airlines, Xiamen.

The LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag by Life Behind Bars Jakarta and the Thule Landmark 40L by Thule are both standout choices in the world of carry on backpacks. Both bags are sized to fit with airline carry-on regulations, with Thule's offering slightly larger, seemingly due to extra depth. This extra depth brings the Thule Landmark 40L to 40 liters of capacity, a tidy 5 liters more than the LBBJKT. Both models provide ample space for those looking to pack light while still hauling along everything needed for a trip.

Here's the comparison in detail:

When it comes to functionality, the LBBJKT and Thule Landmark differ in significant ways. One reviewer praises the LBBJKT for its cycling-friendly design, with the hook system and expandable storage being particularly praised. This bag, according to reviewers, is built to endure commutes, weekend getaways, and long bike adventures with a level of durability and utility that is impressive.

On the other hand, the Thule Landmark is praised for its travel-centered design. Its roomy main compartment, added security features, and ability to fit in tight spaces make it ideal for urban exploration and longer trips away from home. Plus, with a hip belt for weight balance and a nifty water bottle pocket, this bag promises to be a reliable travel companion.

So which bag should you choose? The choice depends on what you want to get out of your backpack. If you’re cycling around and need a sturdy, well-organized bag that can handle the elements and heavy use, the LBBJKT would be the better choice. However, if you're traveling internationally or are someone who tends to fill up every nook and cranny when packing, the Thule Landmark's larger capacity and thoughtful features may better serve you. Both bags clearly exhibit high-quality construction, durable materials, and thoughtful design, making either a well-informed choice.