LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag vs. Thule Landmark 40L
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.6 kg |
| Dimensions | 53×36×12 cm |
| Airline fit | 98% |
| Price | $170 |
Feature by feature
| LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag | Feature | Thule Landmark 40L |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | S |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 2 | Opening | 0 |
| N | Passport | Y |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| S | Backpack | S |
| R | Hip Belt | H |
| S | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 17 | Laptop | 1 |
| 5 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 2 | Water Bottle Holder | 1 |
| Y | Water Resistant | N |
| Material | |
| 1000D CorduraLightweight water resistant polyester inner linings in bright yellowYKK Aquaguard zippers | 420D Dobby polyester, 600D polyester |
Thule Landmark 40L
| Capacity | 40 L |
| Weight | 1.4 kg |
| Dimensions | 56×34×26 cm |
| Airline fit | 91% |
| Price | $149 |
The LBBJKT The Peloton Rolltop Bag by Life Behind Bars Jakarta and the Thule Landmark 40L by Thule are both standout choices in the world of carry on backpacks. Both bags are sized to fit with airline carry-on regulations, with Thule's offering slightly larger, seemingly due to extra depth. This extra depth brings the Thule Landmark 40L to 40 liters of capacity, a tidy 5 liters more than the LBBJKT. Both models provide ample space for those looking to pack light while still hauling along everything needed for a trip.
Here's the comparison in detail:
- Size: LBBJKT is 53" tall, 36" wide and 12" deep vs. Thule's 56" tall, 34" wide and 26" deep
- Weight: LBBJKT weighs 1.6 pounds vs. Thule's 1.4 pounds
- Capacity: LBBJKT holds 35 liters vs. Thule's 40 liters
- Compatibility: LBBJKT fits 98% of airlines vs. Thule's 91%
- Construction: LBBJKT is made of 1000D CorduraLightweight water resistant and YKK Aquaguard zippers vs. Thule's 420D Dobby polyester & 600D polyester
- Laptop pocket: LBBJKT fits a 17" laptop vs. Thule's 15"
When it comes to functionality, the LBBJKT and Thule Landmark differ in significant ways. One reviewer praises the LBBJKT for its cycling-friendly design, with the hook system and expandable storage being particularly praised. This bag, according to reviewers, is built to endure commutes, weekend getaways, and long bike adventures with a level of durability and utility that is impressive.
On the other hand, the Thule Landmark is praised for its travel-centered design. Its roomy main compartment, added security features, and ability to fit in tight spaces make it ideal for urban exploration and longer trips away from home. Plus, with a hip belt for weight balance and a nifty water bottle pocket, this bag promises to be a reliable travel companion.
So which bag should you choose? The choice depends on what you want to get out of your backpack. If you’re cycling around and need a sturdy, well-organized bag that can handle the elements and heavy use, the LBBJKT would be the better choice. However, if you're traveling internationally or are someone who tends to fill up every nook and cranny when packing, the Thule Landmark's larger capacity and thoughtful features may better serve you. Both bags clearly exhibit high-quality construction, durable materials, and thoughtful design, making either a well-informed choice.