Salkan "The Backpacker" vs. Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Salkan "The Backpacker"

Front facing view of the Salkan "The Backpacker"
Capacity45 L
Weight3.4 kg
Dimensions66×32×22 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$345

Feature by feature

Salkan "The Backpacker"FeatureFjallraven Abisko Friluft 35
Storage
removable Compression Y
55L Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
Y Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop N
3 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
Y Rain-fly Y
4 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
900D COTNA Polyester with wax finishG-1000® Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton 100% polyamide 500D

Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35
Capacity35 L
Weight1.55 kg
Dimensions65×32×27 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$185

Key differences between the Salkan "The Backpacker" and Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35

Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, rain cover, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 2 accept both. Every airline that takes one takes the other.

Salkan "The Backpacker" vs. Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35: which should you pack?

The Salkan "The Backpacker" carries 10L more than the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 (45L vs. 35L), while the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 is the lighter pack at 1.55kg (vs. 3.4kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Salkan "The Backpacker" fits 1% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Salkan "The Backpacker"; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 is the better call.