Kathmandu Katabatic 28L Pack vs. Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Kathmandu Katabatic 28L Pack

Front facing view of the Kathmandu Katabatic 28L Pack
Capacity28 L
Weight0.906 kg
Dimensions52×29×28 cm
Airline fit14%
Price$120

Feature by feature

Kathmandu Katabatic 28L PackFeaturePatagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
Y Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
optional Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
100% Polyester630-denier 100% nylon, 200-denier 100% polyester

Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L
Capacity32 L
Weight1.131 kg
Dimensions63×25×16 cm
Airline fit14%
Price$169

Key differences between the Kathmandu Katabatic 28L Pack and Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 26 accept both. 1 accept only the Kathmandu Katabatic 28L Pack, and 0 accept only the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L.

Only the Kathmandu Katabatic 28L Pack fits

Sun Country.

Kathmandu Katabatic 28L Pack vs. Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L: which should you pack?

The Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L carries 4L more than the Kathmandu Katabatic 28L Pack (28L vs. 32L), while the Kathmandu Katabatic 28L Pack is the lighter pack at 0.906kg (vs. 1.131kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Kathmandu Katabatic 28L Pack fits 14% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Patagonia Cragsmith Pack 32L; if you want to travel lighter, the Kathmandu Katabatic 28L Pack is the better call.