Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack vs. Osprey Quasar 28L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack

Front facing view of the Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack
Capacity11.5 L
Weight1.58 kg
Dimensions47×27.5×18 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$80

Feature by feature

Tarion XH Hardshell Camera BackpackFeatureOsprey Quasar 28L
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 0
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
2 Main Compartments 2
N Organizer N
Outside
✓ Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
1 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Polyester & PVA Hardshell210/420/630D Nylon Dobby Blend

Osprey Quasar 28L

Front facing view of the Osprey Quasar 28L
Capacity28 L
Weight0.8 kg
Dimensions34×28×6 cm
Airline fit99%
Price$149

Key differences between the Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack and Osprey Quasar 28L

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 176 accept both. 0 accept only the Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack, and 11 accept only the Osprey Quasar 28L.

Only the Osprey Quasar 28L fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, easyJet, Gulf Air, LC Perú, Lion Air Group, Ravn Alaska, Spring Airlines, VivaColombia, Volaris, Wizz Air.

Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack vs. Osprey Quasar 28L: which should you pack?

The Osprey Quasar 28L carries 16.5L more than the Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack (11.5L vs. 28L), while the Osprey Quasar 28L is the lighter pack at 0.8kg (vs. 1.58kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Osprey Quasar 28L fits 99% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Osprey Quasar 28L; if you want to travel lighter, the Osprey Quasar 28L is the better call.