Kathmandu Nowaki 32L Women's Pack vs. Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Kathmandu Nowaki 32L Women's Pack
by Kathmandu
| Capacity | 32 L |
| Weight | 0 kg |
| Dimensions | 0×0×0 cm |
| Airline fit | % |
| Price | $200 |
Feature by feature
| Kathmandu Nowaki 32L Women's Pack | Feature | Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| N | Compression | Y |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 4 |
| N | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| Y | Hip Belt | Y |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside | ||
| Laptop | N | |
| 1 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| N | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| optional | Rain-fly | Y |
| 2 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| N | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 100% Polyester | G-1000® Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton 100% polyamide 500D |
Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35
by Fjallraven
| Capacity | 35 L |
| Weight | 1.55 kg |
| Dimensions | 65×32×27 cm |
| Airline fit | 1% |
| Price | $185 |
Key differences between the Kathmandu Nowaki 32L Women's Pack and Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35
- Compression straps: No on the Kathmandu Nowaki 32L Women's Pack; Yes on the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35.
- Rain cover: Optional on the Kathmandu Nowaki 32L Women's Pack; Yes on the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35.
- Water resistant: No on the Kathmandu Nowaki 32L Women's Pack; Yes on the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35.
Both have: backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water bottle pockets.
Kathmandu Nowaki 32L Women's Pack vs. Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35: which should you pack?
The Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 carries 3L more than the Kathmandu Nowaki 32L Women's Pack (32L vs. 35L), and the two are closely matched on weight. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 is the better call.