Patagonia Altvia Pack 28L vs. Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Patagonia Altvia Pack 28L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Altvia Pack 28L
Capacity28 L
Weight0.797 kg
Dimensions59×30×27 cm
Airline fit3%
Price$139

Feature by feature

Patagonia Altvia Pack 28LFeatureFjallraven Abisko Friluft 35
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
0 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
Y Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
removable Rain-fly Y
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
140-denier 100% recycled nylon ripstop, 200-denier 100% recycled polyesterG-1000® Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton 100% polyamide 500D

Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35
Capacity35 L
Weight1.55 kg
Dimensions65×32×27 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$185

Key differences between the Patagonia Altvia Pack 28L and Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 2 accept both. 4 accept only the Patagonia Altvia Pack 28L, and 0 accept only the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35.

Only the Patagonia Altvia Pack 28L fits

Adria Airways, Air New Zealand, Island Air, Sun Country.

Patagonia Altvia Pack 28L vs. Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35: which should you pack?

The Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 carries 7L more than the Patagonia Altvia Pack 28L (28L vs. 35L), while the Patagonia Altvia Pack 28L is the lighter pack at 0.797kg (vs. 1.55kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Patagonia Altvia Pack 28L fits 3% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35; if you want to travel lighter, the Patagonia Altvia Pack 28L is the better call.