Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 vs. Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55

Front facing view of the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55
Capacity55 L
Weight1.9 kg
Dimensions73×36×23 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$220

Feature by feature

Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55FeatureFjallraven Abisko Friluft 35
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
Y Hip Belt Y
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
removable Rain-fly Y
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
420HD Nylon PackclothG-1000® Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton 100% polyamide 500D

Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35
Capacity35 L
Weight1.55 kg
Dimensions65×32×27 cm
Airline fit1%
Price$185

Key differences between the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 and Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, hip belt, sternum strap, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 1 accept both. 0 accept only the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55, and 1 accept only the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35.

Only the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 fits

Virgin America.

Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 vs. Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35: which should you pack?

The Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 carries 20L more than the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 (55L vs. 35L), while the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 is the lighter pack at 1.55kg (vs. 1.9kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55 fits 1% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Osprey Farpoint® Trek Pack 55; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Abisko Friluft 35 is the better call.