Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 vs. DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23
Capacity23 L
Weight0.65 kg
Dimensions43×26×12 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$135

Feature by feature

Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23FeatureDSPTCH Camera Ruckpack
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
2 Opening 3
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Bergshell®: 400D 100% polyamideCORDURA® CLASSIC FABRIC

DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack

Front facing view of the DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack
Capacity23 L
Weight1.68 kg
Dimensions45.72×30.48×15.24 cm
Airline fit94%
Price$275

Key differences between the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 and DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 177 accept both. 4 accept only the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23, and 0 accept only the DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack.

Only the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 fits

Air Niugini, Air Tahiti, Great Lakes Airlines, Gulf Air.

Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 vs. DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack: which should you pack?

The Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 carries the same capacity as the DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack (23L vs. 23L), while the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 is the lighter pack at 0.65kg (vs. 1.68kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 fits 96% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 is the better call.