Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 vs. Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23
Capacity23 L
Weight0.65 kg
Dimensions43×26×12 cm
Airline fit96%
Price$135

Feature by feature

Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23FeatureTarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
2 Opening 0
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
1 Main Compartments 2
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ✓
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
Bergshell®: 400D 100% polyamidePolyester & PVA Hardshell

Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack

Front facing view of the Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack
Capacity11.5 L
Weight1.58 kg
Dimensions47×27.5×18 cm
Airline fit93%
Price$80

Key differences between the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 and Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 176 accept both. 5 accept only the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23, and 0 accept only the Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack.

Only the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 fits

Air Tahiti, American Eagle, easyJet, Gulf Air, Ravn Alaska.

Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 vs. Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack: which should you pack?

The Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 carries 11.5L more than the Tarion XH Hardshell Camera Backpack (23L vs. 11.5L), while the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 is the lighter pack at 0.65kg (vs. 1.58kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 fits 96% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Ulvö Rolltop 23 is the better call.