STM Grace vs. ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

STM Grace

by Stm
Front facing view of the STM Grace
Capacity20 L
Weight0.6 kg
Dimensions42×29×11 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$100

Feature by feature

STM GraceFeatureebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 1
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
N Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
100% polyesterBallistic Nylon

ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Front facing view of the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack
Capacity0 L
Weight4.1 kg
Dimensions55×34×20 cm
Airline fit86%
Price$300

Key differences between the STM Grace and ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Both have: built-in organizer, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 163 accept both. 17 accept only the STM Grace, and 0 accept only the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack.

Only the STM Grace fits

Air Niugini, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Gulf Air, Liat Airlines, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Scoot, Tiger Airways, Virgin Australia, WestJet.

STM Grace vs. ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack: which should you pack?

The STM Grace carries 20L more than the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack (20L vs. 0L), while the STM Grace is the lighter pack at 0.6kg (vs. 4.1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the STM Grace fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the STM Grace; if you want to travel lighter, the STM Grace is the better call.