Exped Core 35 vs. Fjallraven Splitpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Exped Core 35

Front facing view of the Exped Core 35
Capacity35 L
Weight0.1 kg
Dimensions62×30×23 cm
Airline fit13%
Price$137

Feature by feature

Exped Core 35FeatureFjallraven Splitpack
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
3 Opening 1
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap N
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
N Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
1680 D Ballistic nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water columnG-1000® HeavyDuty Eco: 65% polyester, 35% cotton

Fjallraven Splitpack

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Splitpack
Capacity35 L
Weight1.15 kg
Dimensions48×28×28 cm
Airline fit15%
Price$200

Key differences between the Exped Core 35 and Fjallraven Splitpack

Both have: backpack straps, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 24 accept both. 0 accept only the Exped Core 35, and 4 accept only the Fjallraven Splitpack.

Only the Fjallraven Splitpack fits

Caribbean Airlines, Croatia Air, Great Lakes Airlines, Sun Country.

Exped Core 35 vs. Fjallraven Splitpack: which should you pack?

The Exped Core 35 carries the same capacity as the Fjallraven Splitpack (35L vs. 35L), while the Exped Core 35 is the lighter pack at 0.1kg (vs. 1.15kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Splitpack fits 15% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Exped Core 35; if you want to travel lighter, the Exped Core 35 is the better call.