Fjallraven Kaipak 28 vs. Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Fjallraven Kaipak 28

Front facing view of the Fjallraven Kaipak 28
Capacity28 L
Weight1.05 kg
Dimensions57×28×21 cm
Airline fit17%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Fjallraven Kaipak 28FeatureDeuter Trans Alpine 32 EL
Storage
Y Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
removable Hip Belt Y
removable Sternum Strap Y
Inside
N Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
Y Rain-fly Y
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cotton 100% polyamide 500D210D PA, 600D PES

Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL

Front facing view of the Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL
Capacity32 L
Weight1.26 kg
Dimensions58×28×24 cm
Airline fit16%
Price$150

Key differences between the Fjallraven Kaipak 28 and Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, rain cover, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 31 accept both. 1 accept only the Fjallraven Kaipak 28, and 0 accept only the Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL.

Only the Fjallraven Kaipak 28 fits

Cayman Airways.

Fjallraven Kaipak 28 vs. Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL: which should you pack?

The Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL carries 4L more than the Fjallraven Kaipak 28 (28L vs. 32L), while the Fjallraven Kaipak 28 is the lighter pack at 1.05kg (vs. 1.26kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Fjallraven Kaipak 28 fits 17% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Deuter Trans Alpine 32 EL; if you want to travel lighter, the Fjallraven Kaipak 28 is the better call.