Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L vs. ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L

Front facing view of the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L
Capacity26 L
Weight0.7 kg
Dimensions53×33×23 cm
Airline fit70%
Price$110

Feature by feature

Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26LFeatureebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 1
N Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop N
1 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
2 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
100% repurposed 600D polyesterBallistic Nylon

ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Front facing view of the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack
Capacity0 L
Weight4.1 kg
Dimensions55×34×20 cm
Airline fit86%
Price$300

Key differences between the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L and ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack

Both have: built-in organizer, water bottle pockets, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 129 accept both. 3 accept only the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L, and 34 accept only the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack.

Only the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L fits

Scoot, Tiger Airways, WestJet.

Only the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack fits

Air Baltic, Air China, Air Malta, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Blue Air, Bulgaria Air, China Eastern, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, flybe, Icelandair, InselAir, Juneyao Airlines, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Pakistan International, Royal Brunei Airlines, Ryanair, S7, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Volotea, Xiamen.

Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L vs. ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack: which should you pack?

The Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L carries 26L more than the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack (26L vs. 0L), while the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L is the lighter pack at 0.7kg (vs. 4.1kg). For carry-on flexibility, the ebags Luxon Rolling Travel Backpack fits 86% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L; if you want to travel lighter, the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L is the better call.