Timbuk2 Scheme vs. Arc'teryx Blade 28

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Timbuk2 Scheme

Front facing view of the Timbuk2 Scheme
Capacity21 L
Weight1.2 kg
Dimensions43×30×14 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$180

Feature by feature

Timbuk2 SchemeFeatureArc'teryx Blade 28
Storage
N Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
side Passport back
Y Passthrough Y
Carry
hideable Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt N
removable Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
6 Main Compartments 4
N Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
N210p-HT nylon 6,6 N630p-HT nylon 6,6

Arc'teryx Blade 28

Front facing view of the Arc'teryx Blade 28
Capacity28 L
Weight1.5 kg
Dimensions54×31×16 cm
Airline fit88%
Price$160

Key differences between the Timbuk2 Scheme and Arc'teryx Blade 28

Both have: luggage passthrough, backpack straps, laptop sleeve, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 166 accept both. 14 accept only the Timbuk2 Scheme, and 0 accept only the Arc'teryx Blade 28.

Only the Timbuk2 Scheme fits

Air Niugini, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Gulf Air, Oman Air, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Jordanian, Virgin Australia, WestJet.

Timbuk2 Scheme vs. Arc'teryx Blade 28: which should you pack?

The Arc'teryx Blade 28 carries 7L more than the Timbuk2 Scheme (21L vs. 28L), while the Timbuk2 Scheme is the lighter pack at 1.2kg (vs. 1.5kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Timbuk2 Scheme fits 95% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Arc'teryx Blade 28; if you want to travel lighter, the Timbuk2 Scheme is the better call.