Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Ortlieb Atrack
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Greenroom136 Rainmaker
| Capacity | 22 L |
| Weight | 1.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 40×28×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 99% |
| Price | $150 |
Feature by feature
| Greenroom136 Rainmaker | Feature | Ortlieb Atrack |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| 4 | Compression | removable |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 0 |
| side | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| N | Hip Belt | Y |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside | ||
| 15in | Laptop | N |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1000D Cordura | PS33 |
Key differences between the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Ortlieb Atrack
- Compression straps: 4 on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; Removable on the Ortlieb Atrack.
- Opening: Clamshell on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; Other on the Ortlieb Atrack.
- Passport pocket: Side on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; No on the Ortlieb Atrack.
- Hip belt: No on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; Yes on the Ortlieb Atrack.
- Laptop sleeve: 15in on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; No on the Ortlieb Atrack.
- Main compartments: 3 on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; 1 on the Ortlieb Atrack.
- Built-in organizer: Yes on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; No on the Ortlieb Atrack.
- Water bottle pockets: No on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; 2 on the Ortlieb Atrack.
Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 89 accept both. 98 accept only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker, and 0 accept only the Ortlieb Atrack.
Only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker fits
Aer Lingus, Aeroflot, Aerolineas Argentinas, Aeromexico, Air Baltic, Air Canada, Air Caraibes, Air China, Air France, Air India, Air Malta, Air Mauritius, Air Niugini, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Tahiti, All Nipon Airways, American Eagle, ANA, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Austrian, Azerbaijan Airlines, Belavia, Blue Air, Boliviana de Aviacion, Brussels Airlines, Bulgaria Air, China Eastern, Czech Airlines, easyJet, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Ethiopian Airlines, Etihad Airways, Eurowings, Fiji Airways, Flair Air, flybe, Gol Linhas Aereas, Gulf Air, Iberia, Icelandair, Indigo, InselAir, Interjet, Iran Air, Japan Airlines, Jet Airways, Juneyao Airlines, Kenya Airways, KLM, LATAM , LC Perú, Liat Airlines, Lion Air Group, LOT Polish, Lufthansa, Luxair, Mahan Air, Meridiana Fly, Mesa Airlines, Nordwind Airlines, Norwegian, Oman Air, Pakistan International, Peach, Porter Airlines, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Brunei Airlines, Royal Jordanian, Ryanair, S7, SAS Scandinavian, Scoot, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Sky Airlines, Spring Airlines, Sun Express, Swiss Int'l Air Lines, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), Tiger Airways, TUI, Turkish Airlines, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris, Volotea, WestJet, Wizz Air, Xiamen.
Examining the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the Ortlieb Atrack as carry-on backpacks offers an interesting look at two distinct approaches to design. First up is the Rainmaker. This monster stands tall at 40 inches with a depth of 21 inches. It's a sizable beast perfectly suited to the traveller looking for durability. It's constructed out of tough 1000D Cordura, and comes equipped with a laptop compartment accommodating up to a 15inch laptop. The carry-on compatibility clocks in an impressive 100%. It definitely prioritizes function over form. Reviewers have noted its sturdy nature, praising its value on the market, and claiming it's great for everyday use, especially if you're carrying electronic devices.
Alternatively, the Ortlieb Atrack boasts a very different set of charms. It is a smaller pack, standing only 5 inches tall with a depth of 56 inches. Yet, it manages to surpass the Rainmaker in terms of capacity, boasting a spacious 25 litres. It's lighter as well, weighing just 1.43 pounds compared to the Rainmaker's 1.7 pounds. It is constructed out of PS33, and comes with a laptop compartment that unfortunately has no capacity for laptops. Though it is only compatible with 47% of airlines, it impresses with its versatility. The Ortlieb Atrack shines as a waterproof option that's great for adventurous environments. Reviewers praise it as ideal for wet conditions and love its accessibility, calling it a comfortable and durable travel tool.
To summarize, the differences look like this:
- The Greenroom136 Rainmaker is larger than the Ortlieb Atrack.
- The Rainmaker is compatible with more airlines.
- The Atrack offers a higher capacity.
- The Rainmaker offers laptop storage, the Atrack does not.
- Reviews signal the Rainmaker as functional, durable.
- Reviews signal the Atrack as versatile, ideal for wet conditions.
Considering the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the Ortlieb Atrack, the former is the choice for rugged functionality, while the latter impresses with its waterproof design and comfort. Both backpacks offer distinct advantages and cater to different traveller's needs. One is not universally 'better' than the other. Evaluate your priorities, weigh them against the benefits of each individual backpack, and make your choice. While the Rainmaker comes with more customizability options and a water-resistant exterior featuring a lot of organization, the Atrack is noted for its comfortable support, weatherproof design, and availability in different sizes. Choose accordingly!