Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Aer Tech Pack 2
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Greenroom136 Rainmaker
| Capacity | 22 L |
| Weight | 1.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 40×28×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 99% |
| Price | $150 |
Feature by feature
| Greenroom136 Rainmaker | Feature | Aer Tech Pack 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| 4 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| side | Passport | top |
| N | Passthrough | Y |
| Carry | ||
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside | ||
| 15in | Laptop | 16in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | N |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1000D Cordura | 1680D CORDURA® ballistic nylon exterior (bluesign® approved) |
Key differences between the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Aer Tech Pack 2
- Compression straps: 4 on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; No on the Aer Tech Pack 2.
- Passport pocket: Side on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; Top on the Aer Tech Pack 2.
- Luggage passthrough: No on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; Yes on the Aer Tech Pack 2.
- Laptop sleeve: 15in on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; 16in on the Aer Tech Pack 2.
Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, built-in organizer, water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 179 accept both. 8 accept only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker, and 0 accept only the Aer Tech Pack 2.
Only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker fits
Air Niugini, Great Lakes Airlines, LC Perú, Lion Air Group, Spring Airlines, VivaColombia, Volaris, Wizz Air.
When it comes to carry-on backpacks, the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the Aer Tech Pack 2 stand out as worthy contenders. The Greenroom136 Rainmaker is a tour-de-force with a size of 40 inches tall, 28 inches wide, and 21 inches deep. Its capacity of 22 liters is impressive, handily beating the Aer Tech Pack 2's 17 liters. Made of 1000D Cordura, it's sturdy, water-resistant, and can handle the rough and tumble of travel. It's also carried a glowing endorsement from one reviewer as "a solid pack that values function above all else," with incredible customizability options.
As for the Aer Tech Pack 2, it measures 18 inches tall, 31 inches wide, and 46 inches deep making it longer but narrower. Constructed from 840D nylon, it balances durability and weight (1.7 pounds, the same as the Rainmaker). The Tech Pack 2's laptop compartment also has the slight edge over the Rainmaker's, accommodating a 16 inch laptop compared to the Rainmaker's 15. Reviewers shared glowing opinions of the Tech Pack 2. One particularly striking quote mentioned its robust durability and weather resistance—as well as its versatility as a perfect fit in a variety of situations.
Here is a brief comparison to contrast the two:
- The Greenroom136 Rainmaker is bigger than the Aer Tech Pack 2.
- The Rainmaker has a larger carrying capacity.
- Both backpacks weigh the same but the Tech Pack 2 can accommodate a slightly larger laptop.
- The Rainmaker is made of thicker material than the Tech Pack 2.
- The Rainmaker is compatible with all airlines, but the Tech Pack 2 only 82%.
- Both are sturdy, water-resistant, and provide excellent organization.
As the conclusion of this comparison, both backpacks shine for their own reasons. The Greenroom136 Rainmaker scores big with its larger capacity and full airline compatibility, making it a great companion on your travels. On the other hand, the Aer Tech Pack 2's strong endorsement from reviewers, laptop compartment size, and durable material makes it a reliable carrier for tech enthusiasts. At the end of the day, your choice would depend on whether you prefer a more travel-oriented backpack or a tech-oriented one. The Rainmaker and the Tech Pack 2 respectively serve these needs superbly.