Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Exped Core 35

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Greenroom136 Rainmaker

Front facing view of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker
Capacity22 L
Weight1.7 kg
Dimensions40×28×21 cm
Airline fit100%
Price$120

Feature by feature

Greenroom136 RainmakerFeatureExped Core 35
Storage
S Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 3
side Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
S Backpack S
N Hip Belt R
S Sternum Strap S
Inside
15 Laptop 0
3 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
0 Water Bottle Holder 0
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
1000D Cordura1680 D Ballistic nylon, PU coated, 1'500 mm water column

Exped Core 35

Front facing view of the Exped Core 35
Capacity35 L
Weight0.1 kg
Dimensions62×30×23 cm
Airline fit89%
Price$137

Right off the bat, it's easy to see that the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the Exped Core 35, while both being esteemed carry-on backpacks, serve different clientele with contrasting needs. Beginning with the Rainmaker, it proves to be a well-rounded backpack that puts function above all else. Measuring a proportionate 40 inches tall, 28 inches wide, and 21 inches deep, the Rainmaker offers a decent 22 liters of capacity. With its 1000D Cordura make, sturdy and water-resistant, it can withstand the heavy pouring rain and serious abuse. Further adding to its charm is the laptop compartment that can accommodate a 15-inch gadget, making it suitable for digital nomads, commuters, or even students.

As for the Exped Core 35, it targets more of the outdoor crowd with its backpacking-oriented design. Sporting a deeper 62-inch dimension, the Core 35 stands shorter at 23 inches and broader at 30 inches. Nonetheless, it trumps the Rainmaker in terms of load capacity at 35 liters. Lightweight at just 0.1 pounds, this bag won't drag you down on a long hike. A noteworthy feature of this bag is its 1680 D Ballistic nylon construction, which ensures serious weatherproofing. However, unlike the Rainmaker, it doesn't offer a dedicated laptop compartment.

To summarize, here are the key differences:

Both backpacks have their individual merits and could well be the best in their class depending on one's preference and use-case. Generally, people quote Rainmaker as “one of the best value bags on the market,” praising it for its versatility and excellent organization. On the other hand, reviewers applaud the Core 35 for being "a lightweight technical mountain pack that does the job in an unfussy, no frills sort of way." The appreciation for its multiple attachment loops and weatherproof build solidifies the Core 35 as a trustworthy pack for those inclined to outdoor activities.