Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Rangeland Travel Backpack 17L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Greenroom136 Rainmaker

Front facing view of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker
Capacity22 L
Weight1.7 kg
Dimensions40×28×20 cm
Airline fit99%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Greenroom136 RainmakerFeatureRangeland Travel Backpack 17L
Storage
4 Compression 4
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
side Passport top
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap N
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
3 Main Compartments 2
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder N
Y Water Resistant N
Material
1000D CorduraPolyester

Rangeland Travel Backpack 17L

Front facing view of the Rangeland Travel Backpack 17L
Capacity17 L
Weight0.6 kg
Dimensions43×31×13 cm
Airline fit95%
Price$36

Key differences between the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Rangeland Travel Backpack 17L

Both have: compression straps, backpack straps, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 179 accept both. 8 accept only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker, and 0 accept only the Rangeland Travel Backpack 17L.

Only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker fits

Air Niugini, Great Lakes Airlines, LC Perú, Lion Air Group, Spring Airlines, VivaColombia, Volaris, Wizz Air.

Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Rangeland Travel Backpack 17L: which should you pack?

The Greenroom136 Rainmaker carries 5L more than the Rangeland Travel Backpack 17L (22L vs. 17L), while the Rangeland Travel Backpack 17L is the lighter pack at 0.6kg (vs. 1.7kg). For carry-on flexibility, the Greenroom136 Rainmaker fits 99% of the airlines we track — the higher of the two. If you prioritise packing volume, choose the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; if you want to travel lighter, the Rangeland Travel Backpack 17L is the better call.