Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. ILE Transit 25L
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Greenroom136 Rainmaker
| Capacity | 22 L |
| Weight | 1.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 40×28×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 99% |
| Price | $150 |
Feature by feature
| Greenroom136 Rainmaker | Feature | ILE Transit 25L |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| 4 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 2 |
| side | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| N | Hip Belt | removable |
| Y | Sternum Strap | removable |
| Inside | ||
| 15in | Laptop | 16in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1000D Cordura | Durable Cordura, waxed canvas, or XPAC sailcloth exterior |
ILE Transit 25L
| Capacity | 25 L |
| Weight | 2 kg |
| Dimensions | 50.8×30.5×15.2 cm |
| Airline fit | 89% |
| Price | $220 |
Key differences between the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and ILE Transit 25L
- Compression straps: 4 on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; No on the ILE Transit 25L.
- Opening: Clamshell on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; Rolltop on the ILE Transit 25L.
- Passport pocket: Side on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; No on the ILE Transit 25L.
- Hip belt: No on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; Removable on the ILE Transit 25L.
- Sternum strap: Yes on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; Removable on the ILE Transit 25L.
- Laptop sleeve: 15in on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; 16in on the ILE Transit 25L.
- Main compartments: 3 on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; 1 on the ILE Transit 25L.
- Water bottle pockets: No on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; 2 on the ILE Transit 25L.
Both have: backpack straps, built-in organizer, water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 169 accept both. 18 accept only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker, and 0 accept only the ILE Transit 25L.
Only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker fits
Air Niugini, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Belavia, easyJet, Etihad Airways, Great Lakes Airlines, Gulf Air, LC Perú, Lion Air Group, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Spring Airlines, Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris, Wizz Air.
When buying a carry-on backpack that fits various airline standards, one cannot go wrong with the Greenroom136 Rainmaker or the ILE Transit 25L. The Rainmaker impresses us with its durability and functional design made of 1000D Cordura material. At the same time, it boasts a robust 22 liters in storage which promises to accommodate your essentials. The backpack carries a weight of 1.7 pounds and its dimensions are 40 inches tall, 28 inches wide, and 21 inches deep. It also steps up its game with a dedicated compartment that easily fits a 15-inch laptop.
On the other hand, the ILE Transit 25L gives you the value of three different materials: Durable Cordura, waxed canvas, or XPAC sailcloth exterior. Despite its own weight of 0 pounds, it offers an additional 3 liters of storage space, bringing the total to 25 liters. Size wise, it stands 50.8 inches tall, is 15.2 inches wide, and 30.5 inches deep with a laptop compartment designed to snugly fit a 16-inch laptop.
- Differences Between Greenroom136 Rainmaker and ILE Transit 25L
- Size and weight: Greenroom136 Rainmaker is smaller and weighs more than ILE Transit 25L.
- Material: Greenroom136 Rainmaker is made of 1000D Cordura while ILE Transit 25L employs Durable Cordura, waxed canvas or XPAC sailcloth exterior.
- Laptop Compartment: The Rainmaker can fit a 15-inch laptop. The Transit can hold up a 16-inch laptop.
- Compatibility: Greenroom136 Rainmaker is 100% airline compatible while the ILE Transit 25L is compatible with 80% of airlines.
Reviewers seem to agree that the Rainmaker offers "an amazing solid pack that values function above all else." They laud the bag's durability, versatile usage, and the range of customizability options. While it isn't short on compliments, the ILE Transit 25L has also won its share of praise. One reviewer was effusive in raising a toast to its waterproof durability and quality construction. In conclusion, both packs offer remarkable advantages. The decision on which to choose ultimately boils down to individual preferences, function requirements, and, of course, the specific equipment you require for your travels.