Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. ILE Transit 25L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Greenroom136 Rainmaker

Front facing view of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker
Capacity22 L
Weight1.7 kg
Dimensions40×28×21 cm
Airline fit100%
Price$120

Feature by feature

Greenroom136 RainmakerFeatureILE Transit 25L
Storage
S Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 2
side Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
S Backpack S
N Hip Belt R
S Sternum Strap R
Inside
15 Laptop 16
3 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
0 Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
1000D CorduraDurable Cordura, waxed canvas, or XPAC sailcloth exterior

ILE Transit 25L

Front facing view of the ILE Transit 25L
Capacity25 L
Weight2 kg
Dimensions50.8×30.5×15.2 cm
Airline fit80%
Price$220

When buying a carry-on backpack that fits various airline standards, one cannot go wrong with the Greenroom136 Rainmaker or the ILE Transit 25L. The Rainmaker impresses us with its durability and functional design made of 1000D Cordura material. At the same time, it boasts a robust 22 liters in storage which promises to accommodate your essentials. The backpack carries a weight of 1.7 pounds and its dimensions are 40 inches tall, 28 inches wide, and 21 inches deep. It also steps up its game with a dedicated compartment that easily fits a 15-inch laptop.

On the other hand, the ILE Transit 25L gives you the value of three different materials: Durable Cordura, waxed canvas, or XPAC sailcloth exterior. Despite its own weight of 0 pounds, it offers an additional 3 liters of storage space, bringing the total to 25 liters. Size wise, it stands 50.8 inches tall, is 15.2 inches wide, and 30.5 inches deep with a laptop compartment designed to snugly fit a 16-inch laptop.

Reviewers seem to agree that the Rainmaker offers "an amazing solid pack that values function above all else." They laud the bag's durability, versatile usage, and the range of customizability options. While it isn't short on compliments, the ILE Transit 25L has also won its share of praise. One reviewer was effusive in raising a toast to its waterproof durability and quality construction. In conclusion, both packs offer remarkable advantages. The decision on which to choose ultimately boils down to individual preferences, function requirements, and, of course, the specific equipment you require for your travels.