Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Greenroom136 Rainmaker
| Capacity | 22 L |
| Weight | 1.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 40×28×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 99% |
| Price | $150 |
Feature by feature
| Greenroom136 Rainmaker | Feature | Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| 4 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 4 |
| side | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside | ||
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1000D Cordura | 100% repurposed 600D polyester |
Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L
| Capacity | 26 L |
| Weight | 0.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 53×33×23 cm |
| Airline fit | 70% |
| Price | $110 |
Key differences between the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L
- Compression straps: 4 on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; No on the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L.
- Opening: Clamshell on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; Top zip on the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L.
- Passport pocket: Side on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; No on the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L.
- Main compartments: 3 on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; 1 on the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L.
- Water bottle pockets: No on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; 2 on the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L.
Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer, water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 132 accept both. 55 accept only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker, and 0 accept only the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L.
Only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker fits
Air Baltic, Air China, Air Malta, Air Niugini, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Belavia, Blue Air, Bulgaria Air, China Eastern, easyJet, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Etihad Airways, flybe, Great Lakes Airlines, Gulf Air, Icelandair, InselAir, Juneyao Airlines, LC Perú, Liat Airlines, Lion Air Group, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Oman Air, Pakistan International, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Brunei Airlines, Royal Jordanian, Ryanair, S7, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Spring Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris, Volotea, Wizz Air, Xiamen.
When it comes to carry-on backpacks, the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the Cotopaxi Cusco Backpack 26L are among the best on the market. Let's take a deep dive and compare these two top-notch options.
The Greenroom136 Rainmaker is a study in function. Clocking in at 40 inches tall, 28 inches wide, and 21 inches deep, it's larger than the Cotopaxi Cusco, which measures 23 inches tall, 33 inches wide, and 53 inches deep. However, the Cotopaxi Cusco is lighter, weighing only 0.7 pounds compared to Rainmaker's 1.7 pounds. Size-wise, the Rainmaker provides 22 liters of spacious carrying capacity, while the Cusco one-ups it with 26 liters.
Next, let's break down the differences:
- Size: The Rainmaker is notably larger, which some users may prefer.
- Weight: The Cusco is less than half the weight of the Rainmaker.
- Capacity: Although both bags are of similar size, the Cusco has a larger capacity.
- Compatibility: The Rainmaker is compatible with all airlines, while the Cusco is compatible with only 65%.
- Materials: The Rainmaker is made of more durable 1000D Cordura, while Cusco is made of repurposed 600D polyester.
- Laptop Compartment: Both have a laptop compartment that fits a 15-inch laptop, but reviewers praise Cusco's sleek look and functionality.
Reviews espouse the Rainmaker’s customizability, durability, and organizational features, while the Cusco gets high marks for its light weight, expansive carrying capacity, and comfortable fit. Interestingly enough, both backpacks accommodate a 15-inch laptop in their respective laptop compartments.
Overall, it seems that if you are looking for a robust, highly customizable carry-on backpack, and you don't mind the extra weight, the Rainmaker is your best bet. However, if your priority is lightweight and greater carrying capacity, then the Cotopaxi Cusco 26L is the clear winner. Either backpack offers a great deal of functionality—each with their own unique set of features and style. It's all about what fits your needs and lifestyle the best. Happy packing!