Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Patagonia Guidewater Backpack 29L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Greenroom136 Rainmaker

Front facing view of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker
Capacity22 L
Weight1.7 kg
Dimensions40×28×21 cm
Airline fit100%
Price$120

Feature by feature

Greenroom136 RainmakerFeaturePatagonia Guidewater Backpack 29L
Storage
S Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
4 Opening 4
side Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
S Backpack S
N Hip Belt S
S Sternum Strap S
Inside
15 Laptop 0
3 Main Compartments 1
Y Organizer N
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
0 Water Bottle Holder 0
Y Water Resistant
Material
1000D Cordura00% recycled nylon plain weave

Patagonia Guidewater Backpack 29L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Guidewater Backpack 29L
Capacity29 L
Weight0.96 kg
Dimensions54×35×23 cm
Airline fit65%

When it comes to carry-on backpacks, it simply boils down to your specific needs and preferences. Let's take a closer look at two different carry-on backpacks – the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the Patagonia Guidewater Backpack 29L.

The Greenroom136 Rainmaker is a staunch contender in this category, with its impressive 22-liter capacity. At 40 by 28 by 21 inches, it fits into the overhead compartment of all airlines. Crafted out of tough 1000D Cordura, it stands up to abuse well and features a laptop compartment that accommodates a 15-inch laptop. Weighing in at 1.7 pounds, it is sturdy, versatile, and water-resistant while favoring functionality over everything else. Despite its astonishing capabilities, it remains lightweight, making it an excellent choice for daily commuting or short trips.

As for the Patagonia Guidewater Backpack 29L, it's slightly larger with a height, width, and depth of 54, 23, and 35 inches respectively. This backpack only fits in 65% of airline carry-on bins. However, don't let the size deter you; with a remarkable capacity of 29 liters, its 100% recycled nylon plain weave construction makes it completely waterproof. Weighing only 0.96 pounds, it is exceptionally light while somehow managing to sacrifice zero durability. Unlike the Greenroom136, it's notable for the absence of a laptop compartment.

In summary:

Each bag has its strengths – the Rainmaker's edge lies in its customizability and organization, the Guidewater's in its lightness and waterproof prowess. The Greenroom136 is well-reviewed as being reliable, worth the price, and extraordinarily customizable. Meanwhile, the Patagonia's main selling point lies in its lightness and complete water-resistance. It all depends on whether you'd be more comfortable carrying a compact, organized pack like the Rainmaker or a lightweight, capacious one like the Guidewater. Either way, you really can't go wrong.