Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack
Greenroom136 Rainmaker
By: Greenroom136
| Size Details
|
||
| Capacity | 22L | |
| Capacity per Weight | 12.9L | |
| Weight | 1.7kg 3.7lbs | Avg |
| Capacity per KgLbs | 12.9 5.9 | Low |
| Dimensions | 40x28x21cm 15.7x11x7.9in | |
| Cubic Space | 23520cm³ 1364.33in³ | |
| Capacity Diff | 1L | Low |
✈️ 100% (198/199)
This bag can be used as a carry on in 100% of airlines.
Features
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | S |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| TopZip | Opening | TopFlap |
| side | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| S | Backpack | S |
| N | Frame | N |
| 2 | Handles | 1 |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| N | Shoulder Strap | N |
| S | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 15 | Laptop | 15 |
| N | Hydration | N |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| N | Shoe Compartment | N |
| Outside | ||
| 0 | Lash Points | 0 |
| N | Hard Shell | N |
| N | Molle | N |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 1 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
|
Material: |
|
| 1000D Cordura | CORDURA® CLASSIC FABRIC |
DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack
By: DSPTCH
| Size Details
|
||
| Capacity | 23L | |
| Capacity per Weight | 13.7L | |
| Weight | 1.68kg 3.7lbs | Avg |
| Capacity per KgLbs | 13.7 6.2 | Low |
| Dimensions | 45.72x30.48x15.24cm 18x12x6in | |
| Cubic Space | 21237.634944cm³ 1296in³ | |
| Capacity Diff | -1L | Low |
✈️ 82% (163/199)
This bag can be used as a carry on in 82% of airlines.
When it comes to carry-on backpacks, the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack have plenty of features to offer. The Greenroom136 Rainmaker stands at a notable 40 inches tall, 28 inches wide, and 21 inches deep, tipping the scale at 1.7 pounds. This handy pack boasts 22 liters of capacity, offering compatibility with all airlines and remarkable customizability - a feature lauded by reviewers who highlight its function above all else.
The DSPTCH Camera Ruckpack, on the other hand, measures considerably less at 15.24 inches tall, although its girth is more expansive at 45.72 inches wide and 30.48 inches deep. A slightly lesser weight of 1.68 pounds makes it an equally light companion for your travel. A little more generous on the inside, it flaits a capacity of 23 liters. Compatibility, however, falls short with only 82% of airlines. The Camera Ruckpack is no slouch when it comes to durability, courtesy of its CORDURA® CLASSIC FABRIC construction.
Here's a quick bullet point comparison:
- Dimensions: The Rainmaker is taller while the Ruckpack is wider and deeper.
- Weight: The Ruckpack is a tad lighter.
- Capacity: The Ruckpack offers an extra liter of capacity.
- Airline Compatibility: The Rainmaker has full airline compatibility. The Ruckpack lacks in this aspect.
- Material: Both are made of durable Cordura fabric, but the Ruckpack uses the classic version.
- Customizability: The Rainmaker scores higher as per its stellar reviews.
Finally, why should you buy one over the other? For the Rainmaker, versatility takes centre stage. It has a bevy of customization options, a sturdy and water-resistant exterior, and an efficient organization system to keep your items in place. The Camera Ruckpack stands out with its side-accessible laptop compartment and multiple tripod attachment points. An exciting perk is its removable padded insert, converting the pack to a general-purpose bag, a boon for photographers when the camera equipment is not needed. Thus the battle of the backpacks rages on, where each has its distinctive charm and functionality to cater to versatile travel needs.