Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Greenroom136 Rainmaker

Front facing view of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker
Capacity22 L
Weight1.7 kg
Dimensions40×28×20 cm
Airline fit99%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Greenroom136 RainmakerFeaturePatagonia Paxat Backpack 32L
Storage
4 Compression Y
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 4
side Passport N
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack Y
N Hip Belt N
Y Sternum Strap Y
Inside
15in Laptop 15in
3 Main Compartments 3
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder 2
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
1000D Cordura630-denier 100% nylon, 450-denier 100% polyester

Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L

Front facing view of the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L
Capacity32 L
Weight0.9 kg
Dimensions51×31×23 cm
Airline fit71%
Price$119

Key differences between the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L

Both have: backpack straps, sternum strap, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 134 accept both. 53 accept only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker, and 0 accept only the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L.

Only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker fits

Air Baltic, Air China, Air Malta, Air Niugini, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Belavia, Blue Air, Bulgaria Air, China Eastern, easyJet, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Etihad Airways, flybe, Great Lakes Airlines, Gulf Air, Icelandair, InselAir, Juneyao Airlines, LC Perú, Liat Airlines, Lion Air Group, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Pakistan International, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Brunei Airlines, Ryanair, S7, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Spring Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris, Volotea, Wizz Air, Xiamen.

When choosing a comfortable and durable backpack for travel or everyday carry, the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L are both remarkable choices. Built like a tank, the Greenroom136 Rainmaker is taller, slimmer and slightly heavier, with dimensions of 40x28x21 inches and weighing 1.7 pounds. This customizability champion boasts of a sturdy and water-resistant exterior thanks to its 1000D Cordura material. But what sets it apart is its 22 Liter capacity compatible with 100% of airlines.

In contrast, the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L is lighter but offers a larger carrying capacity. Weighing a mere 0.9 pounds, it carries a wider and deeper disposition at 23x31x51 inches. This high-quality and socially-responsible backpack with its 32 Liter capacity is compatible with 97% of airlines. It provides a comfortable carry with its ergonomic straps and back panel while maintaining impressive durability thanks to its 630-denier 100% nylon and 450-denier 100% polyester material.

The Greenroom136 Rainmaker comes across as an all-rounder. It offers a lot of organization to keep things in place. Testimonials show what its constituents value most – function above all else through an array of customizability options. In comparison, the Patagonia Paxat Backpack 32L champions in organizing your things to avoid a jumbled mess. It's impressive how comfort, longevity, and social responsibility don't stage a trade-off and crop up simultaneously in this backpack. These two backpacks set a high bar in their own ways, providing ample storage space and durable design.