Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack 27L
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Greenroom136 Rainmaker
| Capacity | 22 L |
| Weight | 1.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 40×28×21 cm |
| Airline fit | 100% |
| Price | $120 |
Feature by feature
| Greenroom136 Rainmaker | Feature | Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack 27L |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 4 |
| side | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| S | Backpack | S |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| S | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 15 | Laptop | 0 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1000D Cordura | 70-denier 100% postconsumer recycled nylon ripstop, 200-denier 100% recycled polyester |
Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack 27L
| Capacity | 27 L |
| Weight | 0.4 kg |
| Dimensions | 40×27×21 cm |
| Airline fit | 99% |
| Price | $90 |
Comparing two market leaders in the carry-on backpack arena - the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack 27L - quickly reveals there's much to consider beyond the price point. Both bags score high in the utility and design stakes, but each shines in its own way. The Greenroom136 Rainmaker, a sizable, robust pack hitting the scales at 1.7 pounds, is designed primarily with adaptibility in mind. Conversely, the Patagonia Tote Pack is a featherweight champion, offering comfort and simplicity at the sacrafice of just 0.4 pounds.
Here's a snapshot of their unique selling points:
- Dimensions: The Greenroom136 is 40" tall, 28" wide, and 21" deep compared to Patagonia Ultralight's more cozy 21" x 27" x 40" dimensions
- Weight: The Greenroom136 Rainmaker is heavier at 1.7lbs, while the Patagonia pack weighs in at just 0.4lbs
- Capacity: The Greenroom136 offers 22L of storage, while the Patagonia Ultralight offers a little more wiggle room, with 27 liters
- Airlines compatibility: The Greenroom136 boasts 100% compatibility, while the Patagonia bag fails to meet the mark only by a single percentage point
- Material: The Greenroom136 is constructed from 1000D Cordura, whereas the Patagonia option comprises of an array of recycled materials
- Laptop compatibility: The Greenroom136 can room a 15" laptop, whereas the Patagonia backpack doesn't provide a laptop compartment
The Greenroom136 Rainmaker is revered for its versatility and its customizability. As one reviewer pointed out, it's "a solid pack that values function above all else", built with water-resistant robustness, and keeping things organized effortlessly. On the other hand, the Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack makes waves with its compact design that can transform into a small pouch. It's also flexible in its usage – can be doubled as a tote bag or a backpack, depending on how you fancy carrying your load. What's more, the padded back doubles as a cushion.
In conclusion, it's a dead heat between the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack 27L. The final decision boils down to personal preference. For those who prefer a sturdy, adaptable pack with plenty of room for organization and who doesn't mind the extra weight, the Greenroom136 Rainmaker might be the one for you. If you're on the hunt for a lightweight, flexible solution, which still offers durability, the Patagonia Ultralight Black Hole® Tote Pack would be more up your street.