Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Osprey Flapjack
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Greenroom136 Rainmaker
| Capacity | 22 L |
| Weight | 1.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 40×28×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 99% |
| Price | $150 |
Feature by feature
| Greenroom136 Rainmaker | Feature | Osprey Flapjack |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| 4 | Compression | |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 0 |
| side | Passport | side |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| Y | Backpack | Y |
| N | Hip Belt | removable |
| Y | Sternum Strap | |
| Inside | ||
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 3 |
| Y | Organizer | Y |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1000D Cordura | 600D Polyspun |
Key differences between the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Osprey Flapjack
- Opening: Clamshell on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; Other on the Osprey Flapjack.
- Hip belt: No on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; Removable on the Osprey Flapjack.
Both have: passport pocket, backpack straps, laptop sleeve, built-in organizer, water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 136 accept both. 51 accept only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker, and 0 accept only the Osprey Flapjack.
Only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker fits
Air Baltic, Air China, Air Malta, Air Niugini, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Belavia, Blue Air, Bulgaria Air, China Eastern, easyJet, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, flybe, Great Lakes Airlines, Gulf Air, Icelandair, InselAir, Juneyao Airlines, LC Perú, Liat Airlines, Lion Air Group, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Pakistan International, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Brunei Airlines, Ryanair, S7, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Spring Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris, Volotea, Wizz Air, Xiamen.
If you're on the lookout for a reliable and sturdy carry-on backpack for your next adventure or for a practical everyday use, two that should definitely be on your radar are the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the Osprey Flapjack.
The Rainmaker by Greenroom136 is a solid and function-focused backpack. Weighing 1.7 pounds, it's slightly heavier than the Flapjack, but it makes up for the extra weight with its rugged 1000D Cordura construction. The Rainmaker also offers 22 liters of storage capacity and a laptop compartment that can comfortably fit a 15-inch laptop. Reviewers sing praises of its sturdiness, versatility, and customizability. According to one, "Overall, it’s a solid pack that values function above all else. And all of the customizability options are incredible."
In comparison, the Osprey Flapjack, lighter at 0.9 pounds, this backpack holds similar bells and whistles. It offers a capacity of 21 liters and, like the Rainmaker, it can stow away a laptop of up to 15 inches in its designated compartment. The Flapjack, however, falls short in its construction material which is 600D Polyspun – a step below in terms of durability than the Rainmaker robust 1000D Cordura.
To summarize the main differences:
- The Greenroom136 Rainmaker is slightly taller and wider, but not as deep as the Osprey Flapjack.
- The Rainmaker is heavier, but also has a larger capacity.
- The Rainmaker utilizes 1000D Cordura, making it sturdier than the Flapjack's 600D Polyspun material.
- In terms of airline compatibility, the Rainmaker has a slight edge over the Flapjack.
On the flip side, the Osprey Flapjack, as the reviewers also note, is indeed one of the best value bags on the market. The lower weight, combined with its size, makes the Flapjack a worthy contender to the Rainmaker. If weight is a priority for you, the Flapjack might just be the way to go. However, if you can bear a slightly heavier backpack for better durability and slightly larger capacity, the Rainmaker should be at the top of your list. Each of them have their own strengths, the final decision should be based on your personal preference, needs and budget.