Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Fjallraven Greenland Top
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Greenroom136 Rainmaker
| Capacity | 22 L |
| Weight | 1.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 40×28×21 cm |
| Airline fit | 100% |
| Price | $120 |
Feature by feature
| Greenroom136 Rainmaker | Feature | Fjallraven Greenland Top |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| S | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 4 | Opening | 3 |
| side | Passport | N |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| S | Backpack | S |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| S | Sternum Strap | S |
| Inside | ||
| 15 | Laptop | 15 |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| 0 | Water Bottle Holder | 2 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1000D Cordura | G-1000® HeavyDuty Eco S: 65% polyester, 35% cotton |
Fjallraven Greenland Top
| Capacity | 20 L |
| Weight | 0.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 43×26×15 cm |
| Airline fit | 84% |
| Price | $120 |
When it comes to carrying your everyday essentials with maximum protection and comfort, the Greenroom136 Rainmaker, and the Fjallraven Greenland Top backpacks step up to the plate quite execellently. These packaways have been made to withstand everyday use and to keep up with your on-the-go lifestyle. They both showcase their unique strengths and subtle differences that may cater to certain preferences.
The Greenroom136 Rainmaker is larger in size and has a bit more weight to it, but with that added weight comes more carrying capacity. The cordura material promises durability and a rugged appearance, and you can trust that this bag will hold up in a variety of environments. It is also highly compatible with most airlines as carry-on luggage. Reviewers laud the customizability options, and its water-resistant exterior that keeps your belongings safe.
Here is a quick comparison summary:
- Size: The Rainmaker is larger.
- Weight: The Rainmaker weighs more.
- Material: The Rainmaker uses 1000D Cordura while the Greenland Top uses a blend of polyester and cotton.
- Airline Compatibility: The Rainmaker is compatible with more airlines.
- Design and functionality: The Rainmaker is praised for its customizability while the Greenland Top has a more classic design.
On the other hand, the Fjallraven Greenland Top backpack weighs less, and while it may not be as flight-friendly as the Rainmaker, you can count on it for everyday use and shorter trips. It is reliably sturdy, despite its seemingly softer exterior being made of 65% polyester and 35% cotton. It has concealed pockets and compartments to protect against theft and sports a classic heritage design that is evergreen and can fit into a wide array of settings - making it versatile. It also earns praise for its comfortable shoulder straps, a boon for those long days of carrying a full pack.
Regardless of the one you choose, whether it's the Greenscreen136 Rainmaker for its ruggedness and versatility, or the Fjallraven Greenland Top for its classic design and comfort, you'd be making a fantastic choice. Both backpacks promise a great mix of design, durability, and functionality - and most importantly, they both offer amazing value for your money.