Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. ebags Luxon Travel Backpack

Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.

Greenroom136 Rainmaker

Front facing view of the Greenroom136 Rainmaker
Capacity22 L
Weight1.7 kg
Dimensions40×28×20 cm
Airline fit99%
Price$150

Feature by feature

Greenroom136 RainmakerFeatureebags Luxon Travel Backpack
Storage
4 Compression N
None Expanded Capacity None
1 Opening 1
side Passport Y
N Passthrough N
Carry
Y Backpack hideable
N Hip Belt hideable
Y Sternum Strap removable
Inside
15in Laptop 19in
3 Main Compartments 2
Y Organizer Y
Outside
× Hard Shell ×
N Rain-fly N
N Water Bottle Holder 1
Y Water Resistant Y
Material
1000D CorduraMilitary-grade ballistic material with waterproof zippers and Hypalon reinforcements

ebags Luxon Travel Backpack

Front facing view of the ebags Luxon Travel Backpack
Capacity0 L
Weight1.8 kg
Dimensions55×31×23 cm
Airline fit68%
Price$250

Key differences between the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and ebags Luxon Travel Backpack

Both have: built-in organizer, water resistant.

Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on

We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 129 accept both. 58 accept only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker, and 0 accept only the ebags Luxon Travel Backpack.

Only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker fits

Air Baltic, Air China, Air Malta, Air Niugini, Air Serbia, Air Seychelles, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, Asiana Airlines, ATA Airlines, Belavia, Blue Air, Bulgaria Air, China Eastern, easyJet, Emirates Airlines, Enter Air, Etihad Airways, flybe, Great Lakes Airlines, Gulf Air, Icelandair, InselAir, Juneyao Airlines, LC Perú, Liat Airlines, Lion Air Group, Luxair, Meridiana Fly, Nordwind Airlines, Oman Air, Pakistan International, Qatar Airways, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Royal Brunei Airlines, Royal Jordanian, Ryanair, S7, Scoot, Shandong Airlines, Shenzhen Airlines, Spring Airlines, Sun Express, TAP Air Portugal, TAROM, Tianjin Airlines (A320 & E190), Tiger Airways, TUI, Ukraine International, VIM Airlines (Closed), Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris, Volotea, WestJet, Wizz Air, Xiamen.

The Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the ebags Luxon Travel Backpack both come with high recommendation, making your decision a tough one. The Rainmaker, crafted by Greenroom136, stands tall at 40 inches, wide at 28 inches, and runs deep at 21 inches. It's a light carry at just 1.7 pounds. What's really impressive is that this sleek bag can hold up to 22 liters of stuff. Reviewers rave that this is a solid, functional pack that's incredible in its customizability options. Described as the complete package at an amazing price, it's truly a consistent performer across all aspects.

On the other hand, the Luxon Travel Backpack by ebags is a beast of its own right. Slightly heavier at 1.8 pounds, it has dimensions of 23 inches by 31 inches by 55 inches. While the Luxon does not specify its capacity, it comes with a unique feature of 3 packing cubes to streamline the packing process. The bag is praised for its wireless charging pocket, secret RFID pocket, and the ability to stow the straps entirely for convenient storage. Materials used on the Luxon are military-grade ballistic with waterproof zippers and Hypalon reinforcements, touting an impressive durability.

Here's a quick comparison of the two:

So which one should you go with? The Rainmaker seems the top choice if you're seeking a sturdy, water-resistant, versatile bag with strong organizational features. It's also universally compatible with airlines. On the other hand, the Luxon Travel Backpack is ideal for those who seek high-tech features, like cordless charging and RFID protection. Its material composition also suggests extreme conditions suitability. In the end, your decision will depend on personal preference and your specific needs for a carry on backpack. Both of these options, however, assure value for the money spent.