Greenroom136 Rainmaker vs. Arcido Oxna
Two carry-on travel backpacks, compared spec for spec.
Greenroom136 Rainmaker
| Capacity | 22 L |
| Weight | 1.7 kg |
| Dimensions | 40×28×20 cm |
| Airline fit | 99% |
| Price | $150 |
Feature by feature
| Greenroom136 Rainmaker | Feature | Arcido Oxna |
|---|---|---|
| Storage | ||
| 4 | Compression | N |
| None | Expanded Capacity | None |
| 1 | Opening | 1 |
| side | Passport | Y |
| N | Passthrough | N |
| Carry | ||
| Y | Backpack | hideable |
| N | Hip Belt | N |
| Y | Sternum Strap | Y |
| Inside | ||
| 15in | Laptop | 15in |
| 3 | Main Compartments | 1 |
| Y | Organizer | N |
| Outside | ||
| × | Hard Shell | × |
| N | Rain-fly | N |
| N | Water Bottle Holder | 1 |
| Y | Water Resistant | Y |
| Material | |
| 1000D Cordura | Kodra Nylon |
Key differences between the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and Arcido Oxna
- Compression straps: 4 on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; No on the Arcido Oxna.
- Passport pocket: Side on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; Yes on the Arcido Oxna.
- Backpack straps: Yes on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; Hideable on the Arcido Oxna.
- Main compartments: 3 on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; 1 on the Arcido Oxna.
- Built-in organizer: Yes on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; No on the Arcido Oxna.
- Water bottle pockets: No on the Greenroom136 Rainmaker; 1 on the Arcido Oxna.
Both have: sternum strap, laptop sleeve, water resistant.
Which airlines take each bag as a carry-on
We checked both bags against the carry-on size limits of 189 airlines. 172 accept both. 15 accept only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker, and 0 accept only the Arcido Oxna.
Only the Greenroom136 Rainmaker fits
Air Niugini, Air Tahiti, American Eagle, easyJet, Great Lakes Airlines, Gulf Air, LC Perú, Lion Air Group, Ravn Alaska, Regional Express, Spring Airlines, Virgin Australia, VivaColombia, Volaris, Wizz Air.
We have two contenders in the ring today: the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the Arcido Oxna. The Rainmaker stands at a bulky 40 inches tall, 28 inches wide, and a deep 21 inches. Weight-wise, it tips the scales at 1.7 pounds, but it also flaunts a hearty capacity of 22 liters. This bag has been tailored for function above all else, a fact that's echoed by a reviewer who championed all its customization options. It’s compatible with all airlines and has a laptop compartment that fits a 15-inch laptop snugly. Its tough 1000D Cordura construction promises a sturdy and water-resistant exterior that can handle the everyday jostle with relative ease.
Meanwhile, the Oxna jumps in at a more compact 20 inches tall, 32 inches wide, and 50 inches deep, allowing it to appeal to the minimalist traveler. This sleek unit only weighs in at 1.1 pounds making it lightweight for its size and capacity which is a generous 28 liters. A noteworthy aspect is its external elastic mesh pocket, and the laptop compartment - padded well and suspended - making it a safe spot for a 15-inch laptop. However, it has a compatibility rating of 81% of airlines.
Let’s look at the contrast between these two a little bit more:
- The Greenroom136 Rainmaker is compatible with 100% of airlines while the Arcido Oxna is 81% compatible.
- The Greenroom136 Rainmaker weighs 1.7 pounds and the Arcido Oxna weighs only 1.1 pounds.
- The Greenroom136 Rainmaker is made of 1000D Cordura, while the Oxna is crafted with Kodra Nylon.
- The Greenroom136 Rainmaker has a capacity of 22 liters; the Arcido Oxna has a capacity of 28 liters.
- Both can house a 15-inch laptop in their dedicated compartments.
After having dissected their dollars and cents, let’s take a look at their unique selling points. The Greenroom is a sturdy, water-resistant bag, that delivers a wide array of organization options. It is adjustable and adaptable to whatever you need to bring with you. On the flip side, the Oxna offers a comfortable user experience, and it’s stylish, techie sleekness should not be overlooked.
In summation, both the Greenroom136 Rainmaker and the Arcido Oxna are undeniably top-notch options, depending on what you're looking for. The former stands out for its robust, versatile style and function, while the latter flaunts a minimal, lightweight design with a bigger capacity. At the end of the day, functionality and personal style will dictate the winner between the two. Choose wisely, travelers.